lör 2007-07-14 klockan 10:32 -0400 skrev Bruce D'Arcus:
> Mikael Nilsson wrote:
>
> >> BTW, the OASIS OpenDocument TC just approved our new RDF-based
> >> metadata
> >> proposal for the format.
> >
> > Cool, where can I find it?
>
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/24327/ODF-Metadata-Proposal.pdf>
>
> It will be changed slightly for inclusion in the main spec, but those
> are very minor editorial changes.
Nice! I'm very happy to see that ODF gets such an excellent metadata
framework. Do you have any recommendations on vocabulary?
A few (surely late, but still) comments:
1. The indentation in the ontology snippets makes it unnecessarily hard
to read.
2. Section 1.2 on in-content metadata seems to duplicate a lot of the
work on RDFa ( http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-primer/ ), which is
focused on XHTML, but still.
>
> ...
>
> > Regarding your question about the "unnecessary" references to the DCAM,
> > it *is* true that RDF implementors will just need the RDF schemas, plus
> > human-readable term descriptions.
>
> But I'm not sure that's clear for the average developer, who may have no
> background with the DCMI work, and may be new to RDF.
Right. I think we need some tutorial-level material in this domain...
Note that all these specs are pretty new in their current incarnation,
so this is in the pipeline....
>
> > They have not yet been finalised, but are in progress. You'll be able to find them at
> >
> > http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/
>
> Thanks. Any ETA?
Well, it's in public comment currently, but Tom might be better
positioned to tell when they might go "live". but certainly within a few
months, we all hope.
/Mikael
>
> Bruce
>
--
<[log in to unmask]>
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
|