> I have a spectrum where I observe peak multiplets. Reading previous posts in
> the archive suggests that the 'proper' way of dealing with this (sub-peaks)
> has not been implemented yet. Is this still the case?
Hi Patrick,
Proper multiplet analysis is still work in progress. Incidentally, we have
scrapped the subPeak idea in favour of peakClusters, - the difference
being that clusters can contain peaks in different spectra (e.g. IPAP
HSQCs).
> One possible approach that was mentioned was to use the 'make intermediate
> peak' option in the right-click menu. However, that seems to be grayed-out
> when I try to do this on a 1D. (A quick test on a 2D suggests it is working
> better there). Perhaps this is not implemented yet in the 1D code?
I'll have a look. I expect that it can be enabled, and was only greyed-out
as a matter of caution.
> In any case, I would be glad to hear any suggestions on how to deal with the
> issue of assigning and keeping track of multiplets.
Generic multiplet analysis and coupling measurement isn't too far away
now, its just that it is quite tricky to get right for all different sorts
of N-dimensional multiplet patterns. ;-)
T.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Tim Stevens Email: [log in to unmask]
Department of Biochemistry [log in to unmask]
University of Cambridge Phone: +44 1223 766018 (office)
80 Tennis Court Road +44 7816 338275 (mobile)
Old Addenbrooke's Site +44 1223 364613 (home)
Cambridge CB2 1GA WWWeb: http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~tjs23
United Kingdom http://www.pantonia.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------ +NH3CH(CH(CH3)OH)C(O)NHCH(CH(CH3)CH2CH3)C(O)NHCH(CH2CH2SCH3)CO2- -------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|