You could try buccaneer to build an initial model, followed by ARP/wARP
to complete the model. I've see some good results on maps in the
2.5-3.5A range with buccaneer, but model completion is still not so good
(although it gets better with each new release).
http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~cowtan/buccaneer/buccaneer.html
Buccaneer is particularly good on well phased maps at lower resolutions
- e.g. after averaging. With high order averaging it should be able to
build at 4.0A.
Tommi Kajander wrote:
> Hi,
> i would be interested in hearing about people's preferences on programs
> for doign auto-tracing of protein chains (with not so great maps), so far
> my feeling has been nothing is at least much better than resolve in doing
> this. but i was wondering if people would care to share examples on cases
> where there was some difference to what you started with...
> ..of course one can always complete and correct by hand but when you are
> doing this with phasing iteratively it would be interesting to hear opinions..
> thanks,
> tommi
>
>
>
|