Hi Yves
I think you are right (I should have picked up on that from the
broadcast). However I still see many sites failing the LHCb SAM tests:
https://lcg-sam.cern.ch:8443/sam/sam.py?sensors=CE®ions=UKI&vo=lhcb&o
rder=SiteName&funct=ShowSensorTests
Dear Site Admins
Please could you check your mappings? I notice problems remain on these
sites:
EFDA-JET
UKI-LT2-Brunel (specifically dgc-grid-35.brunel.ac.uk)
UKI-LT2-IC-HEP
UKI-LT2-IC-LeSC
UKI-LT2-QMUL
UKI-LT2-UCL-CENTRAL
UKI-NORTHGRID-LIV-HEP
UKI-NORTHGRID-MAN-HEP (both CEs)
UKI-SOUTHGRID-CAM-HEP (seems to have several problems under ops too)
UKI-SOUTHGRID-OX-HEP
UKI-SOUTHGRID-RALPP
mpUCDie
The intention of raising this on TB-SUPPORT was to check the underlying
problem affecting most sites. From tomorrow I'll suggest that LHCb
simply raise individual tickets.
If anyone notices some other common problem please inform the list.
Many thanks,
Jeremy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Yves Coppens
> Sent: 12 June 2007 13:27
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: LHCb software installation problems
>
> Hi Jeremy, all,
>
> It could also be related to wrong mapfile config. See the three
> parts LCG broadcast "LHCb VOMS Mapping" or in summary, one should
> have in groups.conf:
>
> for YAIM >= 3.0.1
>
> "/VO=lhcb/GROUP=/lhcb/sgm":::sgm:
> "/VO=lhcb/GROUP=/lhcb/lcgprod":::prd:
> "/VO=lhcb/GROUP=/lhcb"::::
>
> OR for YAIM < 3.0.1
>
> "/VO=lhcb/GROUP=/lhcb/sgm/ROLE=NULL":::sgm:
> "/VO=lhcb/GROUP=/lhcb/lcgprod/ROLE=NULL":::prd:
> "/VO=lhcb/GROUP=/lhcb"::::
>
> Note that the default setting in yaim is:
>
> "/VO=lhcb/GROUP=/lhcb/ROLE=lcgadmin":::sgm:
> "/VO=lhcb/GROUP=/lhcb/ROLE=production":::prd:
> "/VO=lhcb/GROUP=/lhcb"::::
>
> But, I may well have got it wrong :(
>
>
> Yves
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Coles, J (Jeremy) wrote:
>
> > Dear All
> >
> > LHCb are starting another major production run and this is a chance
to
> > see much higher utilisation of resources. Unfortunately there appear
to
> > be many sites where the software manager is unable to install the
latest
> > LHCb software. This *might* be related to the CA certificate version
> > installed. If anyone can verify this or share the actual explanation
> > please respond to this list. It seems sensible to check this on
> > TB-SUPPORT before LHCb raises tickets against sites.
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > Jeremy
> >
|