On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Malcolm J. Currie wrote:
>>>> are we actually aiming to keep CVS and subversion in sync here?
>>>
>>> I think they're doing it just to wind you up. :-)
>>
>> I think it's working :-)
>
>> I'm counting down the days to renaming the directories.
>
> Why impose a second major change? Speaking for myself, once I get svn
> installed, the checkout will have a completely different (svn/ not cvs/)
> tree, so it's a non-issue. If you do rename the familiar directories
> over it's only going to delay matters and lead to more CVS insertions
> until you've finished moving things.
I'm renaming the *CVS* directories so that it won't accept commits without
you having to modify all your CVS/ directories (ie it can be done but
you'll have to know you are doing it and you won't be committing by
mistake).
--
Tim Jenness
JAC software
http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj
|