JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SPORTANDEU Archives


SPORTANDEU Archives

SPORTANDEU Archives


SPORTANDEU@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SPORTANDEU Home

SPORTANDEU Home

SPORTANDEU  June 2007

SPORTANDEU June 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: International games & Oulmers

From:

David Ranc <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

David Ranc <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:23:36 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (141 lines)

I am certainly not as aware of these matters as you guys are but I wonder
whether the obligation to release players, and the obligation for players
to play for their national team really is a breach of individual freedom.
Presumably, since football players have to get a license to play football,
they sign a contract that binds them (the license being the contract).

Second point: the Oulmers case. My understanding is that injuries
sustained by football players are due to the increasing number of cames
they are playing. Why is FIFpro doing nothing about that? There was a
proposal at some point (probably not for more than a second and a half so
I might have missed it if I blinked) to limit the number of games played
every year to x games with club and y games with the national team. I am
of course talking about football and nothing else.

Let me know if I misunderstood this all.

D.R

On Tue, June 26, 2007 19:22, Tassos Kaburakis wrote:
> Paul and Jack's discussion sure has been memorable, I never thought that
> post would lead to such interaction. Attending to the matter of the post,
> indeed, my understanding and interpretation is this, and FIFA appears for
> some time now not assuming FIBA's more intense stance in re: participation
> on national teams:
>
> - FIFA does oblige the clubs to release the players and this is the whole
> criticism from the G14 and the supporters of the Oulmers case, especially
> considering his case, of an injury sustained during national team
> competition, resulting in the player being unavailable for club play due
> to
> the incapacitating injury... It does appear, and the colleagues who are
> closer to this can advise us, that the dialogue b/t Platini, UEFA, the G14
> and other clubs and players representatives (what does FIFPro do during
> this
> anyway, are they included truly?), may lead to more safety nets in re:
> insurance, some form of club representation in the process, essentially
> treating the Oulmers case before the courts do, unless they burnt the
> bridges they started building again...
>
> - FIBA on the other hand had that pretty amazing notion that we read in
> the
> original post:
> H3.6.3 Players' availability to play for a national team
> H.3.6.3.1 General principles (see also H1.12).
> a) Any club which signs a contract with a player is obliged to release
> that player when he is summoned by a national member federation
> to play for its national team in any age category in a main official
> competition of FIBA.
> b) Any player registered with a club is obliged to reply in the
> affirmative when summoned to play for his national team.
>
> Again, any club player IS OBLIGED TO REPLY in the affirmative...
>
> At the same time, basketball players too have been known to negotiate and
> declare their unavailability for national team play, though sometimes in
> the
> past there were direct consequences for national league club play, when it
> was still run by the same federation, before we moved to the new
> professional leagues' model in some sports.
>
> This too has a story behind it that may not be within the lines of this
> correspondence...
> With the limited experience working through FIBA and our Greek basketball
> federation in the past, our two Greek cents here would be that after a
> change in the leadership of FIBA, which will not take place before 2010,
> considering the recent elections (mainly referring to FIBA-Europe here)
> this
> too will be revisited, if not before that time... To clarify, I do believe
> that the present leadership has offered a few good things, but is
> portraying
> an outdated reality in conducting "sport business" affairs... However, the
> "Eastward expansion" which led to getting the crucial voting majority
> (appeared landslide after Marculionis' withdrawal under somewhat
> interesting
> conditions) and essentially led to a renewed term may not be beneficial in
> the immediate (till 2010) future in re: organizing the world of basketball
> under contemporary terms, conditions, and essentially Law mandates...
>
> Having observed the recent developments b/t FIBA and ULEB (the European
> professional leagues' association, featuring arguably the best teams in
> Europe, what the G14 would be for basketball) once again breaking ties and
> going their own way, one has to be sad that we still can't reach common
> ground and find at last a way to bridge the socio-cultural model and all
> the
> practices carried over from the past that will be/are/have been found in
> violation of EU law with what contemporary reality calls for.
> Having said that, Jack's messages did talk to my heart and I appreciate
> them
> profoundly.
> Hopefully we can find some common ground, something that FIBA and ULEB
> haven't reached on two occasions, leading to the breakup of European
> basketball, and UEFA and the G14 hopefully will learn from and won't have
> to
> wait till Oulmers or any irreparable damage to relations...
>
> On the original post, this citizenship v residence issue does appear along
> the lines of the 'classicists' and proponents of preserving the
> socio-cultural model and pyramid structure with the concurrent
> self-regulation of NGOs/ISFs w/o EC or ECJ intervention in our case...
> If this is the case and such regulatory evolution abides by what courts
> have
> commented falling within the "specific nature" of sport then there
> probably
> is no need to worry about any future legal proceedings, or would anyone
> forecast otherwise? Again, this is national teams' international
> competition
> we are referring to, and not the private entities' organization of club
> leagues, that have immediate labor law/services/establishment
> consequences...
>
> Best wishes
>
> Tassos
>
> Sport&EU, The Association for the Study of Sport and the European Union
> can be found at
> http://www.sportandeu.com
>
>
>
>
>


D.R

--

[log in to unmask] (academic / universitaire)
[log in to unmask] (personal / personnelle)

In case the other addresses don't work:
/ Si les autres adresses ne marchent pas :

[log in to unmask]

www.davidranc.com

Sport&EU, The Association for the Study of Sport and the European Union can be found at
http://www.sportandeu.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager