JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SPORTANDEU Archives


SPORTANDEU Archives

SPORTANDEU Archives


SPORTANDEU@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SPORTANDEU Home

SPORTANDEU Home

SPORTANDEU  June 2007

SPORTANDEU June 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: FIFA Executive Committee to NSFs on citizenship v residence -- Participation on National Teams for Intnl Competitions

From:

Paul Fiolkowski <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Paul Fiolkowski <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:18:19 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (87 lines)

Right, you want to see your team win "above all else". To win takes talent and better players. So, by saying you want to win above all else means you want the best players. To get those people on your team means paying their salaries,  which means meeting their salary demands. Anybody in the world is going to go where the money is (just a part of human nature called ambition), especially in a career pathway where you have maybe 10 years or so to maximize your earnings. I think you draw an exceedingly fine line between athletes and entertainers. You go to a game to be distracted from the humdrum banalities of everyday life, to see something achieved, maybe better talent performing on the pitch.  Same reason people go to see a movie: A couple hours when the mind is focused elsewhere. (director/coach, scene/stadium, actor/midfielder)

Yeah this has diverged from the original point, about players competing for their national teams. I have to admit, I thought that Marx nonsense had been laid to rest a few years back.  Closer to home for me, we all saw what Marxism did to Poland (among other places):  almost 50 years of rape, thievery and murder perpetrated on us in the name of Marx.  Capitalism and its attendant self-interest  stimulates innovation and rewards ambition. 

Yep, I say bourgeois is a good thing. 

Dr. Paul Fiolkowski
Senior Lecturer, Sports Therapy
University of Bedfordshire
tel:  01582 734 111 x2162
fax: 01582 489 212
>>> John Fawbert 06/25/07 9:19 PM >>>
Paul

With regard to your first comment, I can only selectively quote Marx, as I couldn't put it better myself:

"The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all... idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley... ties that bound man to his 'natural superiors', and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous 'cash payment'. It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies... of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation. It has resolved personal worth into exchange value..." (Marx & Engels, 1848:38)

You are right that 'companies' will protect their investments, but football clubs have only become more like all other kinds of companies in capitalist societies over the last 15 years or so in the sense that profit maximisation was always one goal, but one that in the past was subservient to utility maximisation in the form of playing success. For the reasons that I gave in my earlier email, I do not accept that footballers are merely entertainers in the same sense as comedians or singers are entertainers. When I go to the theatre, I want to see the best plays by Shakespeare or Chekov or Pinter performed by the best actors like Gielgud or Richardson. 

When I go to see my club play Arsenal I do not want to see the best 'entertainers' in the world like Henry playing against my club. I am glad he has now gone to Barcelona and my team won't have to face him any more. The nouveau fans who like watching Man United on Sky for the 'entertainment' value do not seem to appreciate that for most 'traditional' fans it is about winning above all else and supporting your team through thick and thin. They can't seem to see the point of spending 4 hours getting to an away game at Rotherham on a cold and wet February night to see your team get stuffed.

Anyway, I think this is all getting away from the point i.e. that the new rules do not suggest that players will be forced to play for their countries if they don't want to. Am I right about that Paul?

Best wishes
Jack 

Jack Fawbert
Senior Lecturer Sociology/Criminology
University of Bedfordshire
Polhill Avenue
Bedford
MK41 9EA
>>> Paul Fiolkowski <[log in to unmask]> 06/25/07 8:10 PM >>>
You say 'bourgeois' as if it is a bad thing. ;-)

And yeah, companies everywhere will protect their investments, which is what the players are, and the players only have a career of a few years to entertain  thousands of people (millions). The inevitable decline (of speed/strength/agility) that comes with age will eventaully force their retirement. That is the nature of the sports industry, and I can understand why they would be reluctant to jeopardize their earning potential. They are entertainers, which is why we pay for tickets to the game, or pay to watch via Sky sports, et al. 

Regards,

 

Dr. Paul Fiolkowski
Senior Lecturer, Sports Therapy
University of Bedfordshire
tel:  01582 734 111 x2162
fax: 01582 489 212
>>> John Fawbert 06/25/07 12:16 PM >>>
Paul

It doesn't say that any player registered with a club is obliged to reply in the affirmative when summoned to play for his national team, does it? It says that clubs must release them - that is presumably if they want to play for their country. Several high profile players have decided in the last few years that they didn't want to play for their respective countries anymore; Ryan Giggs, Alan Shearer, Paul Scholes etc. I can't see that this rule (the one you attached) would prevent such a situation from continuing. 

What I think the rule reflects is the increasing bourgeoisification and commercialisation of football clubs. As they become more and more like businesses the decisions that they make are increasingly based on narrow, parochial and selfish economic interests. From their increasingly bourgeois attitude it makes no economic sense to release their players for international duty when they come back tired and, worst, injured. It is a drain on the economic assets of their 'companies'. Unless we want our football to totally reflect the capitalist societies in which it operates, I regard these regulations as sensible. Unless I have got the wrong end of the stick, have I?

Best wishes
Jack

Jack Fawbert
Senior Lecturer Sociology/Criminology
University of Bedfordshire
Polhill Avenue
Bedford
MK41 9EA
>>> Paul Fiolkowski <[log in to unmask]> 06/25/07 11:52 AM >>>
OK, initial thoughts ...  ya gotta be kidding me!
Ummmmmm, any thoughts about free choice here? After all , we are talking about what is essentially a branch of the entertainment industry.

Dr. Paul Fiolkowski
Senior Lecturer, Sports Therapy
University of Bedfordshire
tel:  01582 734 111 x2162
fax: 01582 489 212
>>> Tassos Kaburakis <[log in to unmask]> 06/24/07 12:35 AM >>>

b) Any player registered with a club is obliged to reply in the
affirmative when summoned to play for his national team.
FIFA~http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/administration/ps%5f792%5fen-annex%5fii%5f74.pdf)

Sport&EU, The Association for the Study of Sport and the European Union can be found at
http://www.sportandeu.com

Sport&EU, The Association for the Study of Sport and the European Union can be found at
http://www.sportandeu.com

Sport&EU, The Association for the Study of Sport and the European Union can be found at
http://www.sportandeu.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager