>-I just assume that if it works for me (no easy task) it will
> communicate.
Yeah, as a writer, that's the way I go too, Mark. But as a publisher,
how to you evaluate work? Same?
Androo
On 08/06/07, Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Sounds about right, tho I never know what will please that second
> bunch--I just assume that if it works for me (no easy task) it will
> communicate.
>
> Mark
>
> At 07:59 PM 6/7/2007, you wrote:
> >Mark writes: "the audience I write for is internal--the moment to moment
> >enforcer who says "no, that's the easy way, you don't mean precisely that"
> >or "common wisdom that you don't really believe," or "it sounds wrong,"
> >etc."
> >
> >Yes, that is absolutely true to my practice as well. But, at least for me,
> >that inner voice is aware of the needs of "an imagined other out there in
> >the world." So I don't think it is quite so clear cut as you make out. Maybe
> >what I have been trying to articulate about sincerity is the idea that
> >bothaudiences have to be served.
> >
> >jd
> >
> >--
> >Joseph Duemer
> >Professor of Humanities
> >Clarkson University
> >[sharpsand.net]
>
--
Andrew
http://hispirits.blogspot.com/
http://www.inblogs.net/hispirits
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aburke/
|