Hi,
let me add an AMD result:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 11:36:57PM -0400, David Gutman wrote:
> I would vote for the dual core Xeon (presuming it's using the newer "core"
> architecture). A couple of months ago I did a head to head comparison of an
> AMD , a couple of Pentium D CPU's (2.8, 3 and 3.2 ghz CPU's), as well as a
> Core2Duo E6600. I don't know the exact comparison between the AMD Athlon 64
> and the current Opteron processors, but when I research this about 6 months
> ago, the Core2Duo's were still faster then the latest AMD processors available
> at the time.
>
> RAM Cache FSL_SELFTEST
> AMD Athlon 64 3200+ 1GB 512kb 4300
> Intel Pentium D 2.8 Ghz 1GB 1024 3811
> Intel Pentium D 3.0 Ghz 2GB 2048 3640
> Intel Pentium D 3.4 GHz 1GB 2048 3750
> Intel Core2 [log in to unmask] 2GB 4096 2240
Dual Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 275 2200MHz running 32bit
Ubuntu edgy
3GB RAM
fsl-selftest using the Debian package of FSL 3.3.8: 2096 sec
So Opterons can be easily compared to Intel's babies.
For more bechnmarking you can also look here:
http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/main/index.psp?sec=1&page=hanke/fsl&lang=en#benchmarking
Cheers,
Michael
--
GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke
http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke
ICQ: 48230050
|