JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D Archives


FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D Archives

FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D Archives


FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D Home

FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D Home

FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D  June 2007

FRIENDSOFWISDOM-D June 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Write a review of of Is Science Neurotic?

From:

ian glendinning <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Group concerned that academia should seek and promote wisdom <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:29:00 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (113 lines)

Hi Nick, Chris,

I happen to be reading "Is Science Neurotic" at this moment, and in
the normal course of events would post my "review" to my blog, and
e-mail a link to interested parties, like this discussion group.

I see no-one else has responded to the invite. I was not considering
myself "qualified' to review after reading the notes on the
Metapsychology site, then a thought occurred to me. Part of the
problem is "professional specialists" failing to see the wood for the
trees, and so an "amateur generalist" opinion is probably as valid, if
not more so.

So what I'll do is generate my review in essay rather than blog form,
and see what Chris thinks of it before I publish.

The angle I'm tempted to use, is to bring in other recent reads -
"Shroedinger's Kittens" and "Nature Loves to Hide" - and my own stock
of previous reviews and thoughts to make the point that much of the
message "there is a problem with an exclusively objective (false)
perspective of science" (whether we call it a neurosis or not) that
has been pointed out by many over a very long time. Nick's own work
over several decades has been almost continuously focussed on
propounding and explaing it.

The new thrust in Nick's latest work is to raise this above "writing
about it" as part of normal discourse, to an active "campaign" to get
the need to act recognized. What with other "global" sustainability
issues getting increasingly greater air-play, and let's not debate it,
let's do something about it, perhaps the time has come for such a
campaign to take off. Nick is right to suggest that this scientific
neurosis is the global issue underlying all others.

Let me create a review and get back to you.
Ian
www.psybertron.org

On 6/9/07, Nicholas Maxwell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Dear Friends of Wisdom,
>
>                                    Would anyone like to
> write a review of my book "Is Science Neurotic?" (Imperial College Press,
> 2004)?  It would be for Metapsychology Online Reviews.  In my book I spell
> out the case for wisdom-inquiry, but begin by arguing that neurosis needs to
> be interpreted as a methodological notion.  "Rationalistic neurosis" is a
> condition that arises when any aim-pursuing entity misrepresents its aims.
> It is in this sense that science is "neurotic".  It is often argued that
> psychoanalytic theory does not match up to the exacting standards of
> science.  My argument rather turns this on its head, in that it is science
> which does not match up to the exacting standards of psychoanalysis
> interpreted methodologically.
>
>                                    Details about
> Metapsychology Online Reviews, guidelines for reviews, and the editor,
> Christian Perring, are below.  A copy of my book sits in Christian Perring's
> office, awaiting a reviewer.
>
>                       Best wishes,
>
>                                    Nick Maxwell
> www.nick-maxwell.demon.co.uk
>
> Copy of Email from Christian Perring:-
>
> I am looking for prompt and careful reviewers for
> Metapsychology Online Reviews
> (http://www.mentalhelp.net/books ) (ISSN 1931-5716).
> Either a Ph.D. or ABD in Philosophy, Psychology, or other
> behavioral sciences is preferable. Ideally, reviews should
> draw connections between the subject of the book and issues
> in mental health, psychopathology, normality or emotions.
>
> Guidelines at
> http://alien.dowling.edu/~cperring/revguide.htm
>
> Deadline for reviews: October 1, 2007
>
> If interested, please e-mail me at
> [log in to unmask] with
>
> * your name
> * e-mail address
> * mailing address (even if you have given it previously)
> * list of books you are interested in (the more you list,
> the more likely you can get a book to review)
> * an explanation of your competence to review the books
> (especially for books that many people are likely to want
> to review)
> * details of your ability to write for a diverse readership.
>
> Once assigned, books will be sent out in the next couple of
> weeks.
>
> Thanks,
> Christian Perring
>
>
> Christian Perring, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Dowling
> College
> Home page: http://alien.dowling.edu/~cperring/
> Editor of Metapsychology Online Reviews: http://www.mentalhelp.net/books
> Office Phone: (631) 244-3349
> Dept Philosophy, Dowling College, 150 Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY 11769, USA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
April 2022
March 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
September 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
September 2020
August 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
June 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
October 2018
August 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
March 2017
February 2017
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager