JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives


CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives


CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Home

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Home

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES  June 2007

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES June 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Waiving or Reducing Cost Recovery from Residents

From:

"Ivens, Rob" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Ivens, Rob

Date:

Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:19:27 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (126 lines)

The following case law might be interesting

Case 1 suggests responsibility track up the chain- 

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2006/1083.html

On appeal to house of lords this one suggests it might not.

http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/uk/cases/UKHL/2007/30.html
&query=transco+and+environment+and+agency&method=boolean

I suppose its in the balance 

However, leaving that aside having stared into the abyss, catalogued
everything costed it up and appointed engineers I would warn that some
people get very greedy if there is an open check book and they think
they can "kipper" the council.

I would suggest making sure you have a good system of checks and
balances to ensure that people are confident in the process.. and stop
people getting silly. I would suggest things like getting the budget
together and letting the contract is good for the Council to do..
cheeper and more efficient.

Depending on circumstance we may might feel it was best that these
residents contribute quite a significant sum... after all as our loss
adjuster pointed out "once this is over they can sell their houses..
what more compensation do they want?"- harsh but actually very true.
Also might it not be fair to consider the assets of the householders
thus if you have more you pay more? Although I can imagine that might be
very difficult to administer.. so you could base it on equity in the
property.

Finally I would consider having an absolute cap on ontributions in some
way if it goes horribly wrong. You might consider having some sort of
proper

Hope helps.


Rob Ivens
Scientific Officer
01306 879232
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Darren
Detheridge
Sent: 27 June 2007 15:31
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Waiving or Reducing Cost Recovery from Residents

Dear all,

I would be very grateful for any experiences other local authorities
have had with recovering costs from residents for remediation. We have a
former gas works redeveloepd to residential housing in 1950's and no
Appropriate A Persons. The residents would be the liable party. However
all residents could probably demonstrate that they were unaware of the
situation of the land when they purchased the properties and we are left
with a situation where we have to consider reducing or waiving the costs
based on the hardship test. 

Any hardship, cost recovery policies would be really appreciated

Many thanks in advance

Darren Detheridge

Darren Detheridge
Contaminated Land Officer 
Environmental Services

Direct Phone 01491 823244
Fax 01491 823201
Email: [log in to unmask]
Environmental Services Administration Team 01491 823214
Switchboard 01491 823000
 
South Oxfordshire District Council
Benson Lane
Crowmarsh Gifford
WALLINGFORD
Oxon
OX10 8NL
 
Visit us at www.southoxon.gov.uk ( http://www.southoxon.gov.uk/ )


**********************************************************************
The information contained in this transmission may be
confidential and may also be the subject of legal
professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,
any use, disclosure or copying of any part of this transmission
is unauthorised. If you have received this transmission in
error, please notify the originator immediately.

www.southoxon.gov.uk
**********************************************************************

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE BY ONLY PRINTING THIS EMAIL IF IT IS
ABSOLUTELY
NECESSARY.




This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl -
www.blackspider.com


________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
November 1999
July 1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager