> One feature I miss from Sparky is that one was able to put in a
> separate 'spectrum shift', which basically reflects the required chemical
> shift adjustment. I have previously been advised that one should do this by
> editing the reference frequency in Analysis. While this might be equivalent
> (or even 'proper') in principle, I find that in practice I would prefer to
> have that value (by default) be the value set in the data file / used on the
> spectrometer during acquisition, and have a separate value for the 'in
> retrospect' correction required.
>
> My feeling is that that would have several benefits, but perhaps others might
> disagree? I wonder if anyone else missing this (Sparky) feature or has a way
> around it?
>
I agree that this would be useful - especially for solid-state users.
My way around this is rather old fashioned (and may help convince the
CCPN team to incorporate the feature): I write the original ('proper')
spectrum shift in my lab book so that I can re-enter it, if I want to go
back to it at some point :)!
Vicky
--
****************************************************
Dr. Victoria A. Higman
Leibniz-Institut fuer Molekulare Pharmakologie (FMP)
NMR-Supported Structural Biology
Robert-Roessle-Str. 10
13125 Berlin
Germany
Phone: +49-30-94793 223
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
****************************************************
|