Hi Chris,
Just to say that the table is now correctly reporting the 12TB used for
CMS at RAL-PPD.
Still working on the ralpp VO issue.
Cheers,
Greig
Greig Alan Cowan wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Brew, CAJ (Chris) wrote:
>> For example I'm publishing the CMS usage as ~11TB (which is correct) but
>> the page shows the usages as 17TB. he allocated is correct at 20TB so I
>> suspect the data is just out of date.
>
> Yes, I can see that the table is reporting that cms have 17TB used,
> while the plot shows 12TB (which is correct, since the BDII reports that
> used is 11956003938kB). The information in the table must be adding in
> some data from elsewhere. Hopefully Dave Kant can comment.
>
>> Then there's the issue that if I display all the VOs the RALPP usage is
>> correct in the table but in the graph it uses the CMS number.
>
> Yes, this has been known about for a while, sorry for not fixing it sooner.
>
> Thanks for checking.
>
> Greig
|