Hi Chris,
Brew, CAJ (Chris) wrote:
> For example I'm publishing the CMS usage as ~11TB (which is correct) but
> the page shows the usages as 17TB. he allocated is correct at 20TB so I
> suspect the data is just out of date.
Yes, I can see that the table is reporting that cms have 17TB used,
while the plot shows 12TB (which is correct, since the BDII reports that
used is 11956003938kB). The information in the table must be adding in
some data from elsewhere. Hopefully Dave Kant can comment.
> Then there's the issue that if I display all the VOs the RALPP usage is
> correct in the table but in the graph it uses the CMS number.
Yes, this has been known about for a while, sorry for not fixing it sooner.
Thanks for checking.
Greig
|