It's never been reviewed as far as I know. It's pretty widely used,
and over the years a number of people have pointed out various errors.
It is
On Jun 28, 2007, at 8:53 AM, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
> That's a good question. I believe at least one (if not both) of the
> senior editors of the Chicago Homer are on this list. Has the
> publication been submitted to BMCR, e.g.? Are there other specifically
> classical venues that would review this sort of thing? What about
> digital venues?
>
> As for your final question, I think we should wait until the first has
> been answered before speculating. ;-)
>
> G
>
> Neven Jovanović a écrit :
>> Dear all,
>>
>> is there a scholarly review of the Chicago Homer
>> (http://www.library.northwestern.edu/homer/)?
>>
>> A search on the internet and several scholarly journals databases
>> turns
>> out just one mention (in a book notice: Concordantia Homerica.
>> Pars 2.
>> Ilias, a Computer Concordance to the van Thiel Edition of Homer's
>> Iliad,
>> J. R. Tebben, by A. Kahane, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol.
>> 121.
>> (2001), pp. 182-183.).
>>
>> I would greatly appreciate any information --- also on the possible
>> reasons of Chicago Homer *not* getting a review.
>>
>> Yours,
>>
>>
>> Neven Jovanovic
>>
>> Zagreb, Hrvatska / Croatia
>
> --
> Dr Gabriel BODARD
> (Epigrapher & Digital Classicist)
>
> Centre for Computing in the Humanities
> King's College London
> Kay House
> 7, Arundel Street
> London WC2R 3DX
>
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
> Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980
>
> http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
> http://www.currentepigraphy.org/
|