Ymddiheuriadau am groes bostio
Apologies for cross-posting


Cddi Wrth Debby Rohan/From Debby Rohan: 
PACR Review 2007

Consultation with PACR accredited conservators

PACR has now been in operation for seven years. The 2003 review focused on 
the professional standards and how PACR worked in practice.  Four years on 
PACR is well established and there is a different set of questions to 
address. In addition to this internal consultation we will be seeking the 
views of a much wider circle of stakeholders including educators, 
employers, commissioners and related professional bodies. 

Your input is valuable to this review to help the PACR Management Board 
identify the future developments of PACR for the next five years. 

Please consider the questions below and return the form as a Word document 
attachment to Susan Bradshaw, Accreditation Manager by email 
[log in to unmask] 
 
Q1. What did you think you would gain from being PACR accredited?

Q2. To what extent have your expectations been met?

Q3 Do you think being an ACR adds value to your professional standing? 

      Why/ Why not?

Q4. Do you feel the PACR brand is strong enough and widely-enough known 
that it would be disadvantageous to change it?

Q5a. Do you think the public would feel the marque ‘accredited conservation 
professional’ might offer a higher degree of assurance than ‘accredited 
conservator-restorer’? Do you think other stakeholders (e.g. employers, 
funders) would find the concept of ACP easier than ACR to grasp?

Q5b. Have you any alternative suggestions?

Q6 What three things do you think would improve PACR?




Thank you for your time 
June 2007