And after digestion . . . the poem!
jd
On 4/9/07, Anny Ballardini <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> it is something very peculiar to and typical with poetry, there are
> various forms but they usually follow the same pattern:
>
> the poet writes, proof-reads
> the poet digests
>
> there is usually the digest (2) version, that is when also the reader
> digests, they do not forcibly have to go together.
>
> On 4/9/07, kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > what on earth is the digest version
> >
> > KS
> >
> > On 09/04/07, Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > on another matter:
> > > I used to be subscribed to the digest version of this list (in fact, I
> still
> > > am, on another email address). I've noted that receiving individual
> posts is
> > > far more conducive to responding (lucky old "youze" :)).
> > >
> > > So now that I've mended my ways and am "hearing" every incoming
> thought, one
> > > at a time, it feels more natural to answer.
> > >
> > > Thanks, all, for stimulating conversations!
> > > Sheila
> > >
> >
>
--
Joseph Duemer
Professor of Humanities
Clarkson University
[sharpsand.net]
|