Hi,
Sorry about yet another email on this, but I think urgent clarification is
needed on this whole issue.
Having just been speaking to a couple of publishers (who will remain
anonymous) they both confirmed a substantial proportion of the usage of
their titles was occurring through PMC and that PMC held the full content of
their journals once the embargoed period was over. However, they were not
able to break down the figures any further e.g. by institutions etc. One of
them said that @40% of their total usage was being generated through PMC!
If this is the case for other publishers as well that's an awful lot of
usage that we are being denied access to and could mean that if we are
making subscription decisions on incomplete usage data then we could be
making some very bad decisions indeed!
If you look at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/fprender.fcgi?cmd=full_view
there is a column called Publink Access - "indicates that PMC links to the
publisher's site for the full text of articles, possibly even for free
articles". Strangely there are very few journals in this list that provide
for this. Might this be a way out of this problem (if indeed it exists) i.e.
that PMC should always link to the primary site?
I realise that publishers do not always like to come out in public (not
intended as a double entendre) on this list, but if any out there can help
clarify things with me in this respect off list I would be prepared to
guarantee their complete anonymity when reporting back to this list. The
reason for saying this is that only those publishers participating in PMC
have access to the information on the usage of their journals across the
various platforms their journals are hosted on.
Finally, why can't PMC provide publisher information for each journal on
their web site?
That's all for now folks. Have a good weekend and hope to see many of you at
UKSG next week!
Cheers
Lesley
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lesley Crawshaw, Faculty Information Consultant,
Learning and Information Services
University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
email: [log in to unmask]
phone: 01707 284662 fax: 01707 284666
list owner: [log in to unmask]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-----Original Message-----
From: Lesley Crawshaw [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 13 April 2007 14:08
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: [lib-stats] PubMed Central and Usage Statistics
Hi,
If we take the example of BMJ and select a 2007 article on PubMed Central it
does indeed take me to the Highwire site. There is a note on the page that
says "Full Text is available to subscribers, at the Publisher's Site. Free
full text will be available in PMC 36 months after publication, on January
6, 2010". A DOI is also provided which appears to back this up.
However if I select a 2000 issue (i.e. free content) there is no DOI
provided and it "appears" that full text in this case is being delivered
from PubMed Central and not from the Highwire site.
So it looks like the full text for the non-free content is delivered via
their Highwire site, but the free content is being delivered from the PubMed
Central site.
However, as we are subscribers to this title we would be interested in all
the usage generated by this title whether it is free or not. I think! I
won't get into having separate usage statistics for the archive here as I am
sure this will continue to be debated on this list.
Can anyone else throw any light on this?
Cheers
Lesley
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lesley Crawshaw, Faculty Information Consultant,
Learning and Information Services
University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
email: [log in to unmask]
phone: 01707 284662 fax: 01707 284666
list owner: [log in to unmask]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Karin Perols
Sent: 13 April 2007 13:22
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: SV: [lib-stats] PubMed Central and Usage Statistics
Hi,
I might be wrong here but are you not redirected to the BMJ site for the
more recent articles so you actually get the full text from BMJ (or Highwire
I suppose)? The statistcs would show up there then.
Kind regards
Karin
Karin Perols
Karolinska Institutet
Universitetsbiblioteket / University Library
8:100 (Alfred Nobels allé 8)
SE-141 83 Huddinge
+46 8 524 84 173
[log in to unmask]
ki.se/ub
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: [log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] För Lesley Crawshaw
Skickat: den 13 april 2007 13:14
Till: [log in to unmask]
Ämne: [lib-stats] PubMed Central and Usage Statistics
Hi,
I don't know whether anyone can help me with this query, but I am confused
about usage statistics on PubMed Central. Many journals that exist in other
places also have a presence on PubMed Central. For example the American
Society for Microbiology journals are available both through Highwire and
through PubMed Central. However according to the FAQs on PubMedCentral PMC
doesn't report use by specific institutions. Does this mean that
institutions have no way of knowing about the usage of titles on PubMed
Central? Does this mean then for e.g. the ASM journals that it is impossible
to have a complete picture of their usage because some of the information is
not available to us...or...is this information collected on their Highwire
site?
At: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/about/faq.html
"What kinds of usage statistics does PubMed Central provide to participating
journals?
Each publisher has password-controlled access to a web site that has usage
reports for that publisher's journal(s). The reports, updated daily and
aggregated by month, include counts of available articles, total access by
type of page (table of contents, abstract, full-text HTML, PDF, etc.) unique
IP addresses, and most frequently retrieved or cited articles. Line graphs
of each measure supplement the reports. Any report may also be downloaded as
a CSV file, for analysis with a spreadsheet package such as Microsoft Excel.
PMC also provides a CSV file each month, with usage for the month at the
article level. PMC's usage reports generally contain all information called
for in the COUNTER specification, except that PMC does not report use by
specific institutions. NLM's privacy policy prevents the reporting of use at
an individual or organizational level".
Apologies if I've got this totally wrong, but I only started thinking about
this when a lecturer asked me this morning if she had to request an early
article from BMJ through interlibrary loans. I pointed her in the direction
of PubMed Central where she got the article. It started me wondering about
where the usage statistics were gathered for this and all the other titles
that appear on PubMed Central and through other sites.
Cheers
Lesley
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lesley Crawshaw, Faculty Information Consultant, Learning and Information
Services University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
email: [log in to unmask]
phone: 01707 284662 fax: 01707 284666
list owner: [log in to unmask]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|