Hi Louis
I had sent a mail a long ago to Markus when he asked me most of this stuff
that mail contains a lot more details than this one
cheers
Mario
Quoting Louis Poncet <[log in to unmask]>:
> Mario thanks a lot we will use thoses informations for the repository
> creation (we were aware of python and some other = problems in dep list.
> But again those pkg are not compile on the proper Os.
>
>
> Lp
> --
> Laird Louis Poncet
> Where: Bat28-R-003 CERN
> CH-1211 Geneve 23
> Mail : [log in to unmask]
> Phone: +41(0)227.674.231
> LAL / IN2P3 / CNRS / CERN
>
>
>
> Le 11 avr. 07 à 12:36, Mario David a écrit :
>
>> Hi Louis and all
>>
>> by now I am used to that this issue comes in waves to the lcg
>> rollout from time to time.
>>
>> at LIP-Lisbon we have
>> PPS-LIP fully slc4 for a long time, meaning
>> lcg-CE (containing the site bdii)
>> DPM
>> dCache
>> LFC
>> all WN's
>> UI
>> MON
>>
>> the UI was one of the most problematic simply because of the
>> glite-ui-config, which had to be python 2.2 (were 2.3 is on the
>> distro of slc4)
>> this was solved in the meantime, don't remember which patch
>>
>> DPM dCache and LFC and MON were rather straight forward after you
>> add some packages from the slc3 (don't need to downgrade anything
>> as far as I remember)
>>
>> the WN's you already have now
>>
>> for the lcg-CE (don't have experience with glite-CE) there was a
>> problem with the torque wanting to have tcl/tk 8.3 , we forced it
>> I never knew why torque depends = tcl/tk 8.3 and not a depends on >= 8.3
>> so we have 8.4, and --forced the install of the torque
>> we never experience any problems because of this
>>
>>
>> finally the BDII (either site or top)
>> it installs with no problem, the problem arises after you query the
>> ldap and see wrong or missing information
>> so, in slc3 you have openldap 2.0, while slc4 you have openldap 2.2
>> a matter of downgrading from 2.2 to 2.0 is far from being feasible
>> because a lot of rpm in slc4 depends on that guy
>> so we recompiled ldap 2.0 in slc4, and included thing like the ldap
>> lib of 2.2 on that rpm
>>
>> down to it, 2.2 is backward incompatible with 2.0, the ldapadd of
>> 2.2 is more strict than 2.0, and the way the info plugins are done,
>> you see errors of ldapadd on the ldap logs because of it.
>>
>> and that about a little of that story
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Mario David
>>
>> Quoting Louis Poncet <[log in to unmask]>:
>>
>>> We are nto certifying yet the SL4 othere services.
>>> We didn't want to play the magician managing package create on SL3 and
>>> mixing them with what we have that already compile on SL4.
>>>
>>> So we are waiting for the properly compile package for SL4.
>>>
>>> (The BDII should work without any problem)
>>>
>>> But i am sorry to ask you to wait a bit more time to get the other
>>> services on the SL4 Os.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Laird Louis Poncet
>>> Where: Bat28-R-003 CERN
>>> CH-1211 Geneve 23
>>> Mail : [log in to unmask]
>>> Phone: +41(0)227.674.231
>>> LAL / IN2P3 / CNRS / CERN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 11 avr. 07 à 10:11, Nikolaos Vidiadakis a écrit :
>>>
>>>> I am sorry if I miswrote what I wanted to ask. I only wanted to
>>>> know if someone has installed other roles like glite_CE or
>>>> glite_SE on SL44. Is it diffucult to be setup'd like this? I
>>>> assume that an installation approach similar to the one
>>>> followed for the WN's has to be followed (meaning installing
>>>> packages from 30X repositories).
>>>>
>>>> On 4/11/07, Louis Poncet <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> Good morning.
>>>>
>>>> I am sorry but i don't understand what you mean by out of the box.
>>>>
>>>> Lp
>>>> --
>>>> Laird Louis Poncet
>>>> Where: Bat28-R-003 CERN
>>>> CH-1211 Geneve 23
>>>> Mail : [log in to unmask]
>>>> Phone: +41(0)227.674.231
>>>> LAL / IN2P3 / CNRS / CERN
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 11 avr. 07 à 07:16, Nikolaos Vidiadakis a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Good morning to all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Just curious, all other roles like glite_CE or glite_SE or even
>>>>> BDII can be installed "out of the box" on SL44? As a
>>>>> procedure, is it similar to the one used for the WN's? Does
>>>>> anyone have such a configuration?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/10/07, Vladimir Fekete < [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> I need a help with installation of glite-WN_sl4compat on SLC4 (32bit).
>>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>
|