[log in to unmask] wrote:
> I agree with Laurie on this - what possible justification can Midge have for
> calling him an idiot?
That he presents democracy as a problem which prevents a doctors'
association from being able to make anything happen, ever, and demands
to be told , not what to do since he is actually objecting to that, but
to not do what he does not want to do.
And the idea, which he presents, that some of his colleagues may object
to his demand and therefore there is something wrong with them - or all
of us but Laurie - seems to me inexcusably stupid.
I should perhaps have called him a wise fool, and noted that his
objection to my note on how to bring about what he wanted, if his
colleagues will accept it, reveals more about why Laurie won't get it or
anything like it done, while blaming someone else, than about the rest
of us.
I'm alarmed that it isn't obvious to others of you.
--
A
|