JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  April 2007

GP-UK April 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: British Canadia

From:

Michael Hendry <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

GP-UK <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:06:35 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (51 lines)

Michael Leuty wrote:
> On 23/04/07, Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office)
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> being equivalent to an 80mm lens on a full frame 35 mm (film) camera
> 
> I am loathe to dispute any statement by Our Ade, but I am
> told that this is not really the case. The position of the
> sensor means that your field of view is more restricted than
> it would be with a 35mm film camera *but* the optics of the
> lens remain the same, so that you will get the same (slight)
> amount of foreshortening with a 50mm lens on a digital camera
> as with a film camera.

We're talking here about "Equivalent Focal Length". Because 35mm SLR users
are very familiar with the way lenses of a given focal length behave,
Digital SLR users often use this simplification. 

It comes down to the fact that for "normal" pictures, a focal length that
approximates to the length of the diagonal of the film is appropriate. So
most 35mm SLRs have a focal length of 45 or 50 mm.

Digital cameras in general have smaller sensors than 35mm film, so the focal
lengths of the standard lenses are correspondingly shorter. A 300 mm
telephoto lens on my Nikon D100 behaves like a 400-450 mm lens on a 35mm
camera, because the image being collected by the sensor is smaller - so you
don't have to be so close to an object to fill the frame with it.

The big-nose effect you get when getting a full-frame of someone's face
using a 50mm lens on a 35mm SLR arises because the nose is significantly
closer. You'll get the same distortion with a 30mm lens on a D100. The
solution is to stand further back, so that the nose is not much closer than
the rest of the face. If you want to fill the frame, you'd use a "portrait"
lens on a 35mm camera, with a focal length of around 100mm. The D100 will do
this with a 70mm lens.

Foreshortening effects aren't to do with the optics of the lenses, but to do
with your angle of view. A 50mm lens on a 35mm SLR takes a view which
approximates to the way you see it with the naked eye. This makes the
resulting picture look natural. If you take a very small part of this
picture and enlarge it, you get the same effect as you would using a
telephoto lens, and because you perceive the resulting image as being of an
object closer than it really was, you misjudge the distances of the objects
beyond it.

I've been very pleased with my D100, having been familiar with Nikon film
cameras over the last 30 years. As with all hi-tech equipment, you can get
something much better for much less if you wait, but I hope mine's going to
serve me well for another 5-10 years.

Michael

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager