Probably easiest to start again with the correct FreeR
You can perturnb the strucures
pdbset xyzin MR.pdb xyzout- MRshaken.pdb
NOISE 0.3
That moves everything a bit.
Or if you do enough cyles the FreeR should increase steadily to a
sensible value then level off
Easiest to use the GUI and click the button - add FreeR from existing
mtz file!
Eleanor
Harry M. Greenblatt wrote:
> BS"D
>
> Dear All,
>
> Someone has come to ask my opinion about some inhibitor-protein
> complexes they have refined, isomorphous with a known native structure
> (P21212). After a short look at the statistics, I became suspicious
> about the R-free selection for the new complexes. Indeed, the person
> was not careful about taking the the same R-free set as the native.
> Each complex had a new R-free set, and Refmac was used (i.e., they did
> not benefit from simulated annealing, which according to some would
> have saved the situation). So the difference between R and Rfree is
> about 2-3% for each structure, since the structures are biased to a
> large fraction of the new Rfree set. Technically, the process was
> incorrect, but how can they remedy the situation (short of starting
> from scratch with the proper Rfree set)? Run simulated annealing now,
> and then a round of Refmac?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Harry
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Harry M. Greenblatt
>
> Staff Scientist
>
> Dept of Structural Biology [log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
> Weizmann Institute of Science Phone: 972-8-934-3625
>
> Rehovot, 76100 Facsimile: 972-8-934-4159
>
> Israel
>
>
>
|