Of course, love! Just didn't want to embarras you with
an OTT declaration. You can be assured that in the
future you'll get your due--and then some.
xxxooo
Candice
--- Joseph Duemer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Not love?
>
> jd
>
> On 2/28/07, MC Ward <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > This sounds fine to me, not least because it will
> make
> > it easier for you, but also because we get to keep
> the
> > Joe Duemer we know and like.
> >
> > Candice
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Joseph Duemer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > > Candice, we didn't speak as one because there
> was no
> > > policy being discussed.
> > > I realize that it is impossible for me to _not
> be_ a
> > > list manager when I
> > > post, but Mark has it right. I was speaking as
> just
> > > one member of the list.
> > > How's this as a solution? In future, anything I
> post
> > > in my official capacity
> > > (bwahahahah!) I will sign as Poetryetc
> > > Co-list-manager. Otherwise, everyone
> > > should assume I'm just posting as myself. Just
> > > another member of the list.
> > >
> > > jd
> > >
> > > On 2/28/07, MC Ward <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I didn't think you were promulgating a policy,
> > > Joe,
> > > > and am glad to hear that you've no plans to do
> so.
> > > > Maybe you and your co-manager could speak as
> one
> > > on
> > > > policy matters to avoid confusion(?).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Candice
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- Joseph Duemer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Can't speak for Anny, Candice, but I'm not
> > > > > suggesting that anyone refrain
> > > > > from commenting on anything. Including my
> posts.
> > > I
> > > > > was not promulgating a
> > > > > policy of any kind in my original reply.
> > > > >
> > > > > jd
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/28/07, MC Ward <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anny,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's hard to tell sometimes whether you're
> > > > > speaking
> > > > > > about Chris or Joe--except at the very end
> of
> > > your
> > > > > > post, when you suggest that the long-held
> > > freedom
> > > > > to
> > > > > > comment on _anyone's_ post should be
> > > eliminated. I
> > > > > > feel shocked by the suggestion and hope it
> > > won't
> > > > > be
> > > > > > put in force.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Candice
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- Anny Ballardini
> > > <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am just reading something like 17
> messages
> > > one
> > > > > > > after the other on the same
> > > > > > > but different topics. I am sending this
> > > message
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > support Joseph's
> > > > > > > position. The initial story Chris sent
> in
> > > had
> > > > > little
> > > > > > > to do with anything. I
> > > > > > > have been reading Chris' mails for years
> by
> > > now,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > this is the very first
> > > > > > > time he expressed himself in this way.
> > > > > > > What I do not like are some
> subtle/ironical
> > > > > > > insinuations that followed. I
> > > > > > > think that once an observation like the
> one
> > > > > Joseph
> > > > > > > did is sent, there should
> > > > > > > be no further comment.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 2/28/07, Joseph Duemer
> <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I don't see any policemen around here.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > jd
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 2/28/07, Peter Cudmore
> > > > > > > <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I understood (which is always moot)
> the
> > > > > Buffalo
> > > > > > > deal concerned what was
> > > > > > > > > posted, rather than who posted;
> people
> > > like
> > > > > Alan
> > > > > > > Sondheim, Harry
> > > > > > > > whatsit?
> > > > > > > > > withdrew rather than being banned.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I guess one's attitude to these
> things
> > > > > depends
> > > > > > > on whether, on seeing a
> > > > > > > > > police officer, one thinks: 'how
> > > > > reassuring', or
> > > > > > > 'omigod, what have I
> > > > > > > > > done?'
> > > > > > > > > I tend to the latter, despite being
> > > mostly
> > > > > > > innocent.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Joseph Duemer
> > > > > > > > Professor of Humanities
> > > > > > > > Clarkson University
> > > > > > > > [sharpsand.net]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > Sucker-punch spam with award-winning
> > > protection.
> > > > > > Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Joseph Duemer
> > > > > Professor of Humanities
> > > > > Clarkson University
> > > > > [sharpsand.net]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>
=== message truncated ===
____________________________________________________________________________________
TV dinner still cooling?
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
|