i am having a private party - everyone invited listening to a cd by Frog
Hollow - Farrrrk they are loud - and crap
kind regards from jen
I liked the Stones and the Beatles. And I still like both of them. No need
to discriminate.
----Original Message Follows----
From: TheOldMole <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to poetry and
poetics <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Stones V. Beatles
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:25:44 -0400
It's amazing that this controversy has lasted longer than the Academics vs.
the Beats.
andrew burke wrote:
>It is such a complicated question! I am a swinging voter - at 20,
>definitely
>early Stones beat early Beatles (oh yeah). But then Sgt Pepper came out and
>kicked me back to Rovolver, and I was deep in the heart of jazz coz* * was
>managing a 'cool' jazz joint, with a side salad of blues. I played Sgt
>Pepper's to the members and they freaked - 'Get that pop music off!' - but
>George Martin and Paul had done so much there. But it was always Dylan
>above
>them all for me ... and when the Band kicked in with him, more than ever.
>But then Zappa ... and Tom Waits ...
>
>Blind Boy Burke
>
>
>On 20/03/07, Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>The Pixies.
>>
>>Dominic
>>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Advertisement: Find new & used iPods; designer clothing and more. Join free
at http://www.ebay.com.au
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Frover%2Eebay%2Ecom%2Frover%2F1%2F705%2D10129%2D5668%2D323%2F4%2F%3Fid%3D3&_t=760348364&_r=Findnew&_m=EXT
|