At 17:01 06/03/2007, you wrote:
>Margaret wrote:
>
> > I've read Richard Dawkins God Delusion and this is the point he makes
> > throughout the book, but a god-like being would by definition be of a
> > higher intelligence than we can comprehend.
>
>I don't see intelligence in the definition.
>Acausality, or as we would see it, violations of causality within the
>light cone of the beings discussed and discussing, seems a reliable
>indicator of weakly godlike properties.
Violations of causality are only gaps in understanding.
Equally the exact nature of causality is rather complex.
JB
|