Julian Bradley wrote:
Correctly picking up the point that in one circumscribed area of thought
the notion that what lots of people thought was right ceased to be
adequate and some indication of reason based in objective reality to
believe it was required. But
> I do not understand how "materialism succeeds religion" answers the
> question of distinguishing right and wrong.
>
> An explanation would be great, but a reference would do.
>
Tempting to reply "Marx, K".
However I was commenting on the development of human thinking with the
passage of time rather than specifically absolute right/good/virtue and
wrong/bad/sin.
|