126 by 42. god that sucks. do they normally get back quickly?
James N. Porter wrote:
> Hello-
>
> I'm following the web guide for Multi-Session & Multi-Subject
> (Repeated Measures - Three Level Analysis). I'm wondering if FLAME
> requires that I create the subject means within the context of the
> entire sample, or if I can split up my sample into more manageable
> bits and still obtain accurate results. That is to say, is the program
> calculating an overall variance statistic for the entire sample and
> then using it to evaluate each individual subject? I ask because I am
> currently running an analysis of 42 subject who each have 3 sessions,
> and the accompanying 126 x 42 matrix to define my EVs and the 42 x 42
> matrix to define my contrasts are very unwieldy and slow when FEAT
> tries to generate them on-screen. Would splitting my analyses into
> something like 3 groups be a bad move?
>
|