Steve Smith wrote:
> We did some comparisons originally but now both FAST and SPM versions
> have changed over the years so they are somewhat out of date. I don't
> have a list of more recent comparisons....
There is a small FAST/SPM2/SPM5 comparison within this paper, though
it wasn't the real focus of the work:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2006.880587
I think the paper used current versions of FAST and SPM2; SPM5's
segmentation code has subsequently changed a little. There didn't seem
to be much in it...
Best,
Ged.
|