Yes re-instate.
Keith Milner
On 9 Mar 2007, at 22:02, Maria Ana Botelho Neves wrote:
> Yes for reinstate.
> Maria Ana
>
>
> From: Group concerned that academia should seek and promote wisdom
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Karl Rogers
> Sent: 09 March 2007 21:44
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Petition for Wilfred's Reinstatement
>
> Dear D-list members,
> As I am all sure you know, there has been some considerable
> disagreement and upset regarding the removal of Wilfred from the list
> by the moderators Mathew and Katherine.
>
> I am not going to give an account of events because I am sure that you
> all have been following them. If not and you are concerned about this
> then check the archives.
>
> Some of us support Katherine and Mathew's decision to remove him.
> Others do not and think that Wilfred should be reinstated.
>
> If you think that he should be reinstated then please reply to this
> post and briefly say so.
>
> If you do not think that he should or you would rather abstain then
> please do not reply.
>
> I think that there are 27 members on this list. If that is correct
> then 14 replies will constitute a majority in favour of Wilfred's
> reinstatement.
>
> If such a majority is forthcoming then I urge Mathew and Katherine to
> reconsider their decision. Otherwise, I urge the members of the list
> who disagree with this decision to accept it and move on.
>
> I shall start the ball rolling....
>
> I support Mathew and Katherine's decision to remove Wilfred in the
> first place, given that Wilfred deliberately provoked Mathew by
> repeatedly insulting him, but I think that Wilfred should be given
> another chance and be reinstated on this list, providing that Mathew
> and Katherine agrees to this and Wilfred refrains from insulting
> Mathew again.
>
>
>
> The all-new Yahoo! Mail goes wherever you go - free your email address
> from your Internet provider.
|
