I didn't think you were promulgating a policy, Joe,
and am glad to hear that you've no plans to do so.
Maybe you and your co-manager could speak as one on
policy matters to avoid confusion(?).
Thanks,
Candice
--- Joseph Duemer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Can't speak for Anny, Candice, but I'm not
> suggesting that anyone refrain
> from commenting on anything. Including my posts. I
> was not promulgating a
> policy of any kind in my original reply.
>
> jd
>
> On 2/28/07, MC Ward <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > Anny,
> >
> > It's hard to tell sometimes whether you're
> speaking
> > about Chris or Joe--except at the very end of your
> > post, when you suggest that the long-held freedom
> to
> > comment on _anyone's_ post should be eliminated. I
> > feel shocked by the suggestion and hope it won't
> be
> > put in force.
> >
> > Candice
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Anny Ballardini <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I am just reading something like 17 messages one
> > > after the other on the same
> > > but different topics. I am sending this message
> to
> > > support Joseph's
> > > position. The initial story Chris sent in had
> little
> > > to do with anything. I
> > > have been reading Chris' mails for years by now,
> and
> > > this is the very first
> > > time he expressed himself in this way.
> > > What I do not like are some subtle/ironical
> > > insinuations that followed. I
> > > think that once an observation like the one
> Joseph
> > > did is sent, there should
> > > be no further comment.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/28/07, Joseph Duemer <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't see any policemen around here.
> > > >
> > > > jd
> > > >
> > > > On 2/28/07, Peter Cudmore
> > > <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I understood (which is always moot) the
> Buffalo
> > > deal concerned what was
> > > > > posted, rather than who posted; people like
> Alan
> > > Sondheim, Harry
> > > > whatsit?
> > > > > withdrew rather than being banned.
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess one's attitude to these things
> depends
> > > on whether, on seeing a
> > > > > police officer, one thinks: 'how
> reassuring', or
> > > 'omigod, what have I
> > > > > done?'
> > > > > I tend to the latter, despite being mostly
> > > innocent.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Joseph Duemer
> > > > Professor of Humanities
> > > > Clarkson University
> > > > [sharpsand.net]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
> > Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> >
>
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Joseph Duemer
> Professor of Humanities
> Clarkson University
> [sharpsand.net]
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
|