I am just reading something like 17 messages one after the other on the same
but different topics. I am sending this message to support Joseph's
position. The initial story Chris sent in had little to do with anything. I
have been reading Chris' mails for years by now, and this is the very first
time he expressed himself in this way.
What I do not like are some subtle/ironical insinuations that followed. I
think that once an observation like the one Joseph did is sent, there should
be no further comment.
On 2/28/07, Joseph Duemer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I don't see any policemen around here.
>
> jd
>
> On 2/28/07, Peter Cudmore <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > I understood (which is always moot) the Buffalo deal concerned what was
> > posted, rather than who posted; people like Alan Sondheim, Harry
> whatsit?
> > withdrew rather than being banned.
> >
> > I guess one's attitude to these things depends on whether, on seeing a
> > police officer, one thinks: 'how reassuring', or 'omigod, what have I
> > done?'
> > I tend to the latter, despite being mostly innocent.
> >
> >
> --
> Joseph Duemer
> Professor of Humanities
> Clarkson University
> [sharpsand.net]
>
|