I understood (which is always moot) the Buffalo deal concerned what was
posted, rather than who posted; people like Alan Sondheim, Harry whatsit?
withdrew rather than being banned.
I guess one's attitude to these things depends on whether, on seeing a
police officer, one thinks: 'how reassuring', or 'omigod, what have I done?'
I tend to the latter, despite being mostly innocent.
P
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to
> poetry and poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Robin Hamilton
> Sent: 28 February 2007 17:31
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 70 percent
>
> I thought you were being more specific, Peter, and referring
> to Buffalo98.
> <g>
>
> Are any of the Banned From Buffalo currently on petc? Kent,
> at least,
> though he hasn't posted here recently.
>
> And Mark, though he wasn't actually banned.
>
> Hey, we could start a Banned From Pets list ...
>
> Hm ... Ban Vile Boris? Risky ...
>
> Robin
>
> > Good ;)
> >
> > I was referring to the Buffalo poetics list, which was
> fantastically
> > lively when I first joined it, but died when the moderators
> started to
> > insist that posts be poetics-related, started limiting
> people to one
> > post per day, and stuff like that. I left with my customarily swift
> > and feline grace.
> >
> > P
> >
> >> No idea what you mean, Peter.
> >>
> >> jd
>
|