JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH Archives

OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH  February 2007

OCC-HEALTH February 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Epilepsy

From:

Peter Judge <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Occupational Health mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:32:30 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (82 lines)

Ellie

Both yourself and her GP are not in possession of the facts concerning this ladies case. He is
patently unaware of the job she does for a living and therefore should not have agreed to her
returning there until satisfied she was not a danger to herself or anyone else, and it is not his
job to do this anyway but that of the companies Occupational Health Service. As has been pointed out
before Med 3's are just an opinion and in this case it is not an informed one.

You cannot make an informed decision regarding this lady without knowledge of her condition, the
treatment for it and the management plan both short and long term for her condition. It is
imperative that she gives you consent to obtain this information from her GP or consultant
specialist which I do not doubt she is under the care of considering the length of time she has been
away from work.

It would appear that the GP has requested that she not operate machines due to the anti-convulsive
medication she must be on, epilim can make you unsteady on your feet, shaky and confused.
Considering this I do not believe that you can complete a risk assessment effectively without this
information. If the patient refuses consent for you to contact either her GP or consultant for
information I would suggest you ring or write to her GP pointing out the fact that you cannot
effectively advise her employer without this information and ask the GP to discuss this with his/her
patient and then re-contact you following the meeting.

In the interim I would recommend that she not work with machinery until you can complete an
effective risk assessment and if her employer cannot find suitable alternative duties for her until
then, she should self-certify and review with her GP until she can be effectively cleared to carry
out the duties required of her.

Cheers

Pete



>>> Ellie Paige <[log in to unmask]> 21/02/2007 14:50 >>>
Dear List, I would greatly value your opinion on a tricky subject.
One of our employees, has been diagnosed with epilepsy. She is controlled on medication, but is a
very poor historian, cannot remember what meds she is on and has forgotten to bring in the box or
prescription several times for OH to see the type of meds. She has returned to work but states that
her GP has advised her not to work with machinery.
We are part of the textile industry and make quilts and pillows, so a lot of machinery is in
operation, although it is not manually operated. The duties she will be required to undertake have
been risk assessed, and she has been asked to work with an automated machine which pushes wadding
through into a pillow case. She will be on the receiving end, ie she places the pillow case onto the
'nozzle' and the wadding is 'blown' into it.  She will be part of a  small team, and if she has any
incidents, the machinery will push her away into a safe area, as opposed to pulling her in. there
are no external moving parts, just the air blowing through. No night working, full day shift with a
phased return to work, as she has been off   8months so far.
She has stated she is unable to undertake this as it includes working with machinery, and has
declined permission to contact her GP to see exactly what advice has been given.
I know this is long winded, but does anyone have any advice or options out there at all. Is the
company wrong to consider her working in such an area, despite the risk assessment??
Any answers gratefully received
Ellie

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please remove this footer before replying.

For list archives and documents, go to
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html 

FORTHCOMING CONFERENCES AND EVENTS:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH 

For Occupational Health jobs, go to http://OHJobs.drmaze.net 

Find out about Occupational Health Nursing Education in UK at
http://home.wlv.ac.uk/~in6232/aohne/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please remove this footer before replying.

For list archives and documents, go to
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html

FORTHCOMING CONFERENCES AND EVENTS:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH

For Occupational Health jobs, go to http://OHJobs.drmaze.net

Find out about Occupational Health Nursing Education in UK at
http://home.wlv.ac.uk/~in6232/aohne/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager