Hi Sarah,
I have working on this issue for the last 15 years as an activist. Back in the day and believe me the topic will come again (to do the rounds) around the issue of definitions (semantics), particularly of being Black and racism.
Racism is a political concept (we are not born as racists) and not just about prejudice! This much we have to understand, once we know its political we then have to put it in the framework of power and prejudice. Therefore, power + prejudice = Racism. I, as a Black man cannot be racist to another Black man or Woman as being Black in this society (western) I am without the same powers (respect, authority, economic wealth, political representation, access, need for interpretations etc)as my white counter-parts.
What about the poor white folk? Yes, they are without a lot of power too and in some instances face the same or similar issues in terms of health inequalities. However, the service and access to treatment may vary for them as compared to a Black person as they are not viewed on the basis on their skin colour.
The simplest way of measuring racism (that will lead to unequal treatment and therefore extend the inequalities gap) is to find the most common denominator. In the case of racism that is the racist ( the ignorant, the evil or the stupid or whichever). The methodology is simple........if a Black (I include Asian in the term Black) person was walking with his/her white friend/partner down a well known racist area, who would be noticed? what would they notice? and what is the reaction of these people to the newcomers?.
Equality is about being put on the 'same level playing field as the white majority' and knowing that certain groups of people will (some people unknowingly)feel or are victims of direct, indirect and Institutional (I helped McPherson define) racism. And until we get on the same level field the concept of "one size fits all" is in itself discriminatory.
I hope this helps, I could write much more (but got to get on with my GES!!)
Kind regards,
Dipen
Dipen Rajyaguru LL.B (Hons)
Health Equality & Diversity Specialist
Barnet PCT
020 8937 7709
-----Original Message-----
From: Health of minority ethnic communities in the UK
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 28 February 2007 11:49
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: tackling health inequality - promoting equality: what's the
difference?
Greetings
Sorry for multiple postings but I am trying to put together some ideas
in a short accessible/ practical briefing or Q&A on the differences and
similarities between concepts and action around tackling health
inequalities and promoting equality to help both policy and NHS people
get their heads round the questions and wondered if people had thoughts.
Essentially I come across some confusion amongst some of my public
health (and other) colleagues in PCTs and in policy development, who as
far as I can tell (but I am probably being a bit simplistic) tend to
think that what they do to tackle health inequalities has the objective
of achieving equality (or equity... another whole discussion point) and
therefore they are unclear how promoting equality is diferent and what
the various equality duties mean for them in addition to what they do
already.
I am sure one aspect is that it is unusual as far as I can see (apart
from honourable exceptions such as James Nazroo and colleagues) for the
influence of discrimination on health to be examined rigorously. People
do study barriers to accessing health services but do not seem as part
of that to consider for instance cultural stereotyping by staff and
things like lack of interpreting services are not seen as discriminatory
let alone institutionally racist. In fact I think probably what
discrimination actually is may be difficult for (public health) people
to pin down and I think some people in the NHS think that we are all so
nice and we treat everyone equally (hah!) so what's it got to do with
us?
One example of the confusion (but this time seeing the agendas as
entirely separate) in our PCT public health has been asked to lead on
the development of an equity strategy and HR have got the lead for a
single equality scheme but apparently little senior level discussion
about possible synergy.
I also actually do have in my sights policy development at a higher
level (yes, Dept Health) and would like to answer questions such as
"doesn't the Choosing Health white paper do that (promote equality)?"
and "what does the equality agenda have to do with us (PH policy
people)?"
Sooo after this longwinded introduction does anyone understand what I
am talking about and want to put their oar in/ direct me to useful work?
Needless to say I will share what I come up with and ensure that the
experience and knowledge of this e-group is reflected and acknowledged
in what I produce and of course people will be able to use and adapt it
for their own purposes.
Thanks very much!
Sarah
Sarah Corlett
Consultant in Public Health
Lambeth Primary Care Trust
1 Lower Marsh
London, SE1 7NT
Tel: 020 7716 7097
em: [log in to unmask]
Lambeth Primary Care Trust will be smokefree from 30 December 2005.
To protect the health of patients, staff and visitors, smoking will not
be allowed in Trust buildings or grounds.
For advice and support on giving up, contact Lambeth Stop Smoking
Service on 0800 856 3409 or [log in to unmask]
DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended exclusively for the use of the individual(s) or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you may not use, copy, print, distribute or deliver this message to anyone (or any part of its contents). If you received this email in error please notify the originator of the message and destroy all copies from your computer. The views, opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are solely those of the author and are not endorsed by Barnet Primary Care Trust unless otherwise indicated by an authorized representative.
All reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in this e-mail. However it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus free. Barnet Primary Care Trust accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or its attachments. Please note that the integrity and security of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet.
(MSG6.02.4)
|