We're looking to increase our self-service facilities and specifically
to introduce self-return machines
As far as I can see there are 2 options:
1) self-return machines (usually switchable issue/return machines) where
the student is alerted via the screen which bin to put the returned book
in (i.e. one bin for normal checkins, and one bin for books with holds
and other "problem" books)
2) self-return machines which physically take the books from the
students, and sort them automatically (i.e. out of the students' reach)
via a conveyor belt system or similar into one of a number of
library-configurable bins (e.g. by classmark/floor/location etc as well
as sorting holds)
Now machines of variety 2 (i.e. automatic returns sorting machines) seem
to cost at least 3x the cost of machines of variety 1. And of course a
strong business case would need to be made for that levek of spending!
I've seen automatic returns sorting machines in use, and thought they
were great. In that particular case, they'd started with student-sorted
machines, but found that owing to the resulting problems and workload
for staff they just couldn't cope, and they had therefore got the money
for automatic returns sorting machines. Problems they (and a couple of
other colleagues from difrerent libraries) have specifically
mentioned/experienced are;
- students realising that once hold books have been scanned (i.e.
checked in from their user record), there's nothing to make them
actually put the book in the correct bin, and therefore hold books were
being hidden within the library, causing daily problems when the
reserver came in to collect the book, which then couldn't be found.
(This has resulted in at least one library having its machines
reconfigured so that they won't check in items with holds at all, and
students are instead told to return these books to the Lending Desk
staff directly.)
- students putting books in the bins without checking them in at all,
and the books then being reshelved while still checked out and not
resensitised. (This type of problem has meant that in some libraries
*all* books in the returns bins are re-returned by library staff to make
sure that all are checked in on the LMS)
Of course, this level of extra work by library staff would count against
the cheaper cost of these "student-sorted" machines as opposed to
automatic sorting machines. So in my mind a pertinent question is, how
long would it take for a more expensive machine to pay for itself in
staff time savings?!
Therefore, in order to help me decide whether to make a case for an
automatic returns sorting machine, I'd like any feedback you can give me
on problems experienced by student-sorted self-returns machines (and
staff time implications), and/or benefits given by automatic returns
sorting machines.
I can summarise for the list if there's interest?
Thanks
Lesha
--
Lesha Fossey MA MCLIP
Assistant Librarian, Circulation Services
University of Exeter
Stocker Road TEL: 01392 263878
Exeter FAX: 01392 263871
EX4 4PT E-MAIL: [log in to unmask]
|