At 15:29 04/02/2007, you wrote:
>Julian Bradley wrote:
> > Following this led as Google hit number 1 to:
> >
> > http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1142625,00.html
> >
> > This seems to give an incredibly sensible and balanced report which
> > doesn't mention anywhere "pretendy-reformed" or political issues
> > _except_ for the assumed legal separation of church and state in the US.
>
>Read the judgement in the case.
The judgement is 139 pages.
I've read part (before your email, because of interest). If you
would care to give even a general guide to which part of the
judgement I'd be happy to look in more detail.
Julian
|