JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  February 2007

GP-UK February 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

How should sickness certification work?

From:

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

GP-UK <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:50:05 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (58 lines)

I think this is an excellent and important question. The person who is most
qualified to assess whether a patient is fit for work is (most of the time)
their own GP, IMHO - although I note a reply to a doctor in an FAQ on the DWP
site that emphasises that the clinician responsible for managing the patient's
condition is the one who should issue a certificate, making a nonsense of
patients who are told postop that they need 2 or 3 months of work, but then have
to come and see us for a sick note, because the hospital shirk their
certification duties. 

We all know that there a significant minority of people who do not want to work,
and who wish to obtain sick notes so they don't have to appear to be seeking
work. We GPs IMHO are in the best position to ascertain whether or not they are
genuinely ill. I personally see certification as part of my social
responsibility as a doctor (as well as an obligation). 

So, can anyone propose a cheaper and better method of providing and assuring
certification of sickness in our country? I say "cheaper", because no government
is ever going to accept a change in regulations that costs more. 

Laurie Miles

> -----Original Message-----
> From: GP-UK [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Adrian Midgley
> Sent: 09 February 2007 1:37 pm
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [GP-UK] Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med
> certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)
> 
> Paul Bromley wrote:
> > As I have said before though, this is archaic, we should not 'live
> > with it' and it does need changing. GPs as a group put up with too
> > many things without challenging why. If I have to start seeing the
> > ones that I do telephone consults for it is likely to take me a
> > further 5 hours or so per week - with little benefit to anyone.
> >
> > How do we go about getting this 'dark age' stuff changed?
> 
> How would we like it to work instead?
> 
> --
> A


**********************************************************************
Information in this message  may contain  confidential and  privileged
information.  If you are not  the intended recipient please accept our
apologies; please do not disclose,  copy or distribute  information in
this e-mail or take any  action in reliance on its  contents: to do so
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform us that this
message  has  gone  astray  before  deleting it.  Thank  you for  your
co-operation.
 
NHSmail is used daily by over 100,000 staff in the NHS. Over a million
messages  are sent every day by the system.  To find  out why more and
more NHS personnel are  switching to  this NHS  Connecting  for Health
system please visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail 
**********************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager