On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:18:24 +0530, Pearson, Elaine <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Accessibility or inaccessibility depends on the user. It is too
> simplistic to say something is accessible or inaccessible. It depends on
> who is using it. For someone with good vision but learning difficulties,
> and alt tag may be of no use at all, nor would a text only page, whereas
> it may be very satisfactory for a blind user. A sight that is largely
> graphics or animations may be great to the user with learning
> difficulties but no use to a blind user. There is no such things as
> accessible or inaccessible, so stating something in negative terms isnot
> necessarily helpful.
Emmanuelle's point is to note that something is deliberately designed in a
particular way. Liddy's suggestion of using some of the other DC stuff to
explain the audience, etc, is a good one IMHO.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Fundacion Sidar
[log in to unmask] +61 409 134 136 http://www.sidar.org
|