JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRISIS-FORUM Archives


CRISIS-FORUM Archives

CRISIS-FORUM Archives


CRISIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRISIS-FORUM Home

CRISIS-FORUM Home

CRISIS-FORUM  February 2007

CRISIS-FORUM February 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: [Fwd: [Nocarbontrade-l] European carbon trading "will not lead to significant cuts in emissions by companies" in its 2nd phase any more than it did in its 1st phase]

From:

"Wright, Steve" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Wright, Steve

Date:

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:12:55 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (106 lines)

Interesting to learn of expert opinion emerging from the Fraunhofer Institute.....Wonder if this is the same Fraunhofer Institute in Ettlingen organising the next European Non-Lethal Weapons conference? Hmmm very handy to have all the corporate options covered....


Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion list for the Crisis Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Keene
Sent: 26 February 2007 21:12
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [Fwd: [Nocarbontrade-l] European carbon trading "will not lead to significant cuts in emissions by companies" in its 2nd phase any more than it did in its 1st phase]




-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[Nocarbontrade-l] European carbon trading "will not lead to 
significant cuts in emissions by companies" in its 2nd phase any more 
than it did in its 1st phase
Date: 	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:25:47 +0000
From: 	Larry Lohmann <[log in to unmask]>
To: 	[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]




'"The EUETS has given no extra incentives for greenhouse gas reductions 
or changes to the fuel mix," said Philip Luyten, environment manager at 
Total Petrochemicals.'



ENDS Report
February 2007


EUETS will not drive abatement in phase 2

Even with a tight cap on emissions in the second phase, the EU emissions 
trading scheme (EUETS) will not lead to significant cuts in emissions by 
EU companies, delegates at ENDS’ second emissions trading conference 
heard at the end of January.

Dr Joachim Schleich of the Fraunhofer Institute in Germany compared the 
emissions caps in 23 national allocation plans (NAPs) with the verified 
emissions from the scheme’s first year and projected emissions in 2010.

Presenting his findings at the ENDS conference, he highlighted the 
differences between the 12 NAPs which have been amended by the European 
Commission (ENDS Report 383, pp 46-47 
<http://www.endsreport.com/article.cfm?ArticleRef=383068>), and the 
remaining 11 NAPs so far published which have yet to be assessed.

On average, the caps in the 11 to be assessed are only 2% lower than 
projected emissions in 2010, while the caps in the 12 amended NAPs are 
set around 12% lower than projected emissions

He told delegates that even with the tougher caps the EUETS will require 
only modest emissions reductions by installations in the second phase 
because member states and the Commission have not set a tight limit on 
the use of Kyoto credits.

The 11 NAPs yet to be assessed set caps around 42MtCO_2 lower than 
business-as-usual emissions in 2010, but they propose to allow more than 
300MtCO_2 , of Kyoto credits into the scheme, effectively requiring no 
emissions reductions by the industries covered.

The 12 NAPs amended by the Commission are more demanding. Their combined 
caps are 142MtCO_2 lower than business as usual, but even here the 
Commission is proposing to allow more than 111MtCO_2 of Kyoto credits. 
Thus 78% of the effort can be met by purchasing emissions reductions 
outside the EU.

"In the second phase, even if there is a similar judgment for the 
remaining plans, [installations] won’t need a lot of reductions," he 
said. "The incentives to reduce internally may be weakened."

Delegates with direct experience of the scheme said the low price of 
carbon in the first phase had not offered much incentive to cut emissions.

"Let’s be realistic and honest, the market was long in the first phase, 
so the EUETS has given no extra incentives for greenhouse gas reductions 
or changes to the fuel mix," said Philip Luyten, environment manager at 
Total Petrochemicals.

He said that the high cost of energy had been much more of a driver 
encouraging firms to cut emissions. However, he did reveal that many 
companies are now factoring a cost of carbon into future investment plans.

German Environment Minister Sigmar Gabriel has announced his country 
will accept the cap set by the Commission. The statement marks a u-turn 
by the German government which had threatened a court challenge (ENDS 
Report 384, p 12 
<http://www.endsreport.com/article.cfm?ArticleRef=384013>). The German 
decision leaves Slovakia isolated as the only member state considering 
an appeal against the Commission’s cuts.

The price for allowances in the second phase remained stable at ˆ14.60 
on the news, but the price of current allowances continued to fall, 
reaching a new low of just ˆ1.23 as ENDS went to press.





To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2022
May 2018
January 2018
September 2016
May 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
September 2015
August 2015
May 2015
March 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
July 2004


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager