Interestingly enough (or not as the case maybe), the CCP4 study
weekend now goes out as the January issue of Acta D in order to try
and raise the impact rating. Something to do with the scoring
working on a calendar year.
Charles
On 19 Feb 2007, at 10:50, Kevin Cowtan wrote:
> J. Appl. Cryst.
>
> I have used it for things which I think need publishing, but are of
> more abstract subjects and less direct interest to the biological
> crystallography.
>
> However, politics and finances may dictate otherwise. Acta D has
> for some reason a rather poor impact rating, and J. Appl. Cryst. a
> rather better one. I am 'encouraged' towards using J. Appl. Cryst.
> even when it is less suitable for the target audience.
>
> Kevin
>
> Marius Schmidt wrote:
>> Dear colleagues,
>> I was wondering whether someone of you has reported/published
>> new or improved crystallographic software somewhere
>> else than Acta Cryst. It would be nice if you could
>> share your experience with me. Topics might be:
>> - quality of the journal
>> - rapid publication - literate peers
>> - ...
>> Thank you very much in advance
>> Marius
>> PD Dr. habil. Marius Schmidt
>> Physikdepartment E17
>> Technische Universitaet Muenchen
>> James Franck Strasse
>> 85747 Garching/Germany
>> email: [log in to unmask]
>> http://users.physik.tu-muenchen.de/marius/
>> phone: +49-(0)89-2891-2550
>> fax: +49-(0)89-2891-2548
|