So instead of saying:
analysis myProject.xml
you say:
analysis -m 64 myProject.xml
Having thought about this a bit more, I'd be a bit surprised if that
really helped much, if at all, but worth a punt. I think the fundamental
problem is that there is too much data for too little memory (the story of
our lives). (And the memory leaking is not helping.)
Wayne
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Roberto Kopke Salinas wrote:
> Hi Wayne,
>
> I have suse 10.0, and I recently upgraded analysis to version 1.0 release 13.
> What is the "analysis -m" option?
> I will try to use pre-calculated countours, perhaps that will help me if i can
> switch from using pre-calculated countours to the normal way easily.
> roberto
>
>
> On Friday 16 February 2007 14:40, Wayne Boucher wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Are you on a Linux box? And which version of Analysis are you using?
> > (One nasty and one not-so-nasty memory leak was sorted in 1.0.13.)
> >
> > In theory a native OpenGL ought to be faster. (Brian could give you
> > better chapter and verse on that one.) But 256 MB ram is definitely
> > pushing it.
> >
> > As of 1.0.13 you can use pre-calculated contours (after you pick your
> > peaks!). This should help a lot, especially on a low-memory machine.
> > (But of course you cannot then more the contour levels up and down.)
> >
> > There is a -m option when you start up analysis. The default is 128 Mb.
> > But that is only a measure of (most of) the C world memory, it excludes
> > the Python world memory. So for you, "analysis -m 64" might be a better
> > option. (Hard to call, that one.)
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Roberto Kopke Salinas wrote:
> > > Hi Brian,
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > Yes the peaks were within the assignment tolerances. It looks like a bit
> > > a silly, but i just quitted and re-started the program and now the
> > > program it is drawing the assignments on the spectrum!!
> > >
> > > Anyway I have another question/comment: analysis is quite slow on my
> > > computer (256MB ram) and uses a large amount of memory, becomming more
> > > and more slow during the day. Is this related to the fact I am using Tk
> > > as graphics handler? Are there ways to circunvent this?
> > >
> > > roberto
> > >
> > > On Friday 16 February 2007 13:53, Brian Smith wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Roberto Kopke Salinas wrote:
> > > > > I added a new peak and a new spin system in my hsqc spectrum. However
> > > > > when I try to link peaks in HNCACB to this new spin system, the new
> > > > > resonaces do not appear as possibilities in the assignment panel.
> > > >
> > > > Are the HNCACB peaks within the shift tolerances of the new resonances
> > > > shifts (check shifts of each peak and tolerances for each spectrum)?
> > > >
> > > > > I can select both peaks and propagate the assignment, but then I
> > > > > still dont see the assignment drawn on the spectrum.
> > > >
> > > > Propagate will only work if the resonances are within the assignment
> > > > tolerances.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Roberto Kopke Salinas
> > > Instituto de Química
> > > Universidade de São Paulo
> > > Av Prof Lineu Prestes 748
> > > 05508-900 São Paulo SP Brasil
> > > Tel: #55-11-3091-3312 r. 110
>
> --
> Roberto Kopke Salinas
> Instituto de Química
> Universidade de São Paulo
> Av Prof Lineu Prestes 748
> 05508-900 São Paulo SP Brasil
> Tel: #55-11-3091-3312 r. 110
>
|