On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:32:52 -0800, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>pixdim1 0.8280000091
>pixdim2 0.8280000091
>pixdim3 2.2000000477
It also appears that you are using interpolated data. This will cause both
bedpost and probtrack to take far longer than they otherwise would on
non-interpolated data. Interpolating the data will not result in higher
quality results, and might actually cause problems:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:10:55 +0000, Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Your sacnner has upsampled the resolution of your image to <1mm in-
>plane. This is what is causing it to be slow, and it will also cause
>huge problems at later stages.
>
>You should turn this feature off on your scanner, so that your data
>is analysed at the resolution that it is acquired. Then everything
>will run much faster.
>
>cheers
>
>T
|