Hi Liddy,
Thanks for your quickly response.
Well, if there are not such thing as an "accessible" resource, my life don't
have sense <smile> Because I'm working from 1996 about the accessibility in
the software and the Web. But I understand what you want to say and the
posture of the group about this <smile>
And yes, in the future HERA will produce RDF reports on the adaptability
characteristics of a resource, I hope so.
For the moment I'm working around the "accessibility" concept (but with and
eye in the adaptability too). This means: conform with the WCAG or another
guidelines.
And I know the "dcterms:conformsTo", but I'm looking for a way to say: this
resource don't conform and don't want conform, and don't must conform
<smile>.
All the best,
Emmanuelle
-----Mensaje original-----
De: DCMI Accessibility Community [mailto:[log in to unmask]] En
nombre de Liddy Nevile
Enviado el: miércoles, 07 de febrero de 2007 0:47
Para: [log in to unmask]
Asunto: Re: Not accessible or not adaptable.
Emmanuelle
As it is not ever clear that there is such a thing as an 'accessible'
resource but that resources are accessible or otherwise to individual users,
I would suggest that you write metadata on the resource, following the
scheme we are developing for DC, and then individuals or later, computers,
can match those resources to user's individual needs and preferences.
The metadata we are working on makes objective statements about the
characteristics of the resource, not claims about accessibility or
otherwise. We describe this as metadata related to the adaptability of a
resource but do not say yes or no, rather declare the characteristics. Of
course, we note what makes a difference in line with the W3C guidelines and
other work.
For more info I suggest you see the DC page and then look at what is on the
wiki where there is a lot more detail.
http://dublincore.org/groups/access/
http://dublincore.org/accessibilitywiki
In fact, we would love to see Sidar adapt HERO to produce RDF reports on the
adaptability characteristics of resources in the future.
Liddy
On 07/02/2007, at 7:26 AM, Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This group was working in how define the adaptability's resource.
> But I need
> a way to declare / define that a resourse don't be and don't will be
> accessible or adaptable.
>
> For example, we have some resource to teach accessibility that don't
> conform the WCAG. These are bad practice examples, and must be not
> accessibles.
>
> How can I preserve its that a review or classification as "bad"
> resources?
>
> Sorry if I can explain it properly, my English is very bad, but I hope
> that someone can understand me and explain it to the others.
>
> Any idea?
>
> All the best,
> Emmanuelle
|