JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for INT-BOUNDARIES Archives


INT-BOUNDARIES Archives

INT-BOUNDARIES Archives


INT-BOUNDARIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

INT-BOUNDARIES Home

INT-BOUNDARIES Home

INT-BOUNDARIES  January 2007

INT-BOUNDARIES January 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Russia - China Boundary regulation 1994?

From:

"Kwiatkowska, Barbara" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Kwiatkowska, Barbara

Date:

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:24:48 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (167 lines)

Dear Mr Han,
	Enclosed are some previous IBRU exchanges on the Russia/China
Boundary you asked about, which are all available under respective dates at:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/int-boundaries.html
	Best regards, Barbara

-----Original Message-----
From: International boundaries discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Smaardijk
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 09:20
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 2004 China/Russia Border Treaty

Dear Victor,

The 2004 China/Russia Border Treaty you're looking for can be found at:
www.akdi.ru/gd/proekt/096937GD.SHTM (in Russian). Hopefully you can find
someone to translate it sooner than I can do it at the moment, but in any
case now you know where to find it.

Peter Smaardijk

-----Original Message-----
From: International boundaries discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Professor Victor
Prescott [[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 10:54
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [INT-BOUNDARIES] The Amur-Ussuri junction

Dear Colleagues,

I have just realised that spending all my time on maritime boundaries 
I do not know whether China and Russia sorted out their land-boundary 
problem at the Amur-Ussuri junction. If the issue has been settled 
I'd be pleased to know the outcome. If it is unsolved who occupies 
the island?

Sincerely, Victor Prescott

-----Original Message-----
From: Professor Victor Prescott [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 23:04
To: Kwiatkowska, Barbara
Subject: Re: China and Russia finish land boundary

Dear Barbara. Many thanks. 
Sincerely, Victor

China/Russia Trade of 17 January 2007 at:
http://en.rian.ru/world/20070117/59229225.html

2005 Russia's Ratification of the 2004 China/Russia Border Treaty of 3 June
2005 at:
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200506/03/eng20050603_188218.html; 18 May
2005 at: www.russiajournal.com/news/cnews-article.shtml?nd=48172, 14 October
2004 Treaty at:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-10/14/content_2091406.htm &
www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/zxxx/t165266.htm; 
	plus http://www.themoscowtimes.com/indexes/01.html &
http://www.mosnews.com/ & http://en.rian.ru/ &
http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/level2.html?GroupID=146 &
www.russiapolitical.com, www.russiajournal.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 17:16
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: China and Russia finish land boundary

Dear Colleagues,

According to the Associated Press (Beijing, 14 Oct 2004) and Xinhua
(http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-10/14/content_2091406.htm), China
and Russia signed an agreement yesterday that completed delimitation of
their 4,300-km land boundary.

The news reports do not give specifics.  The countries signed agreements in
1991 and 1994 that delimited most of the eastern and western sections of
their boundary (on either side of Mongolia).  Most of the boundary has now
been demarcated.  Presumably, the new agreement resolves the status of
several river islands.

The small pockets remaining in dispute were located in the western section
of the boundary.  In 1996, President Yeltsin, Boris explicitly identified
islands "in the Amur River not far from Khabarovsk and the ... Bolshoy
island in the Argun River" as continuing in dispute.  The same three islands
were cited by the head of the Russian delegation to the Russian-Chinese
Demarcation Commission on 8 August 1997.  The countries disagreed about
which side of the islands front on the main river channel, which is their
international boundary.  The disputed islands included those at the
confluence of the Amur and Ussuri Rivers near Khabarovsk, which the Chinese
lump together as Heixiazi Island but the Russians name Bolshoy Ussuriyskiy
Island and Tarabarov Island.  The islands have a combined area of some 330
sq km.  There may also have been a small, associated islet north of
Tarabarov at issue.  Bolshoy [great] island in the Argun River, which is a
tributary of the Amur, was also disputed.

The Treaty of Aigun (1858) defined the Amur River as the Sino-Russian
boundary.  It specified that lands on the left bank were Russian and those
on the right bank were Chinese, thus leaving river islands in uncertain
status.  The Treaty of Peking (1860) defined the boundary as following the
Amur River to its junction with the Ussuri River, and then turning southward
along the Ussuri.  China and Russia disagreed about where the confluence of
the two rivers was.  Accretion and conflicting maps added to the dispute
over the islands.

A draft agreement on principles of joint economic use of "certain islands
and surrounding waters on border rivers" was also initialed during the 1997
summit.  Subsequently, a Russian official said that the joint-use agreement
did not apply to Bolshoy Ussuriyskiy or Tarabarov Islands, but might be used
for Bolshoy Island in the Argun.  Negotiations continued on the disputed
river islands, resulting in the 14 October 2004 agreement.

Regards,
Dan Dzurek

Daniel J. Dzurek
mailto:[log in to unmask]
President
International Boundary Consultants
3601 Wisconsin Avenue, NW Suite 409
Washington, DC  20016-3051
Phone: 1-(202)-364-8403 

-----Original Message-----
From: International boundaries discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pho Hoang Han
mailto:[log in to unmask]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 03:59
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [INT-BOUNDARIES] Russia - China Boundary regulation 1994?

Hello everyone!

Iam looking for the english version of Agreement on Regulation on boundary
management bt. Russia and China (March 27, 1994), If anyone would have, that
would be a great help for our research and reference.

Thank you very much in advance.

*************
Pho Hoang Han (mmm.)
Manager of Information Division - Center for Information.
Boundaries Committee - Ministry of Foreign Affairs
58 Nguyen Du. Hanoi - Vietnam
tel.84 08046041(off); 844 7563376(h); fax.84 08046029; 
cel. 0913593801 
mailto:[log in to unmask]
*Stay Cool and Keep Smiling!: **B.K.: For in any event as long as Bad Luck
Year of the Dog continues, until the Best Luck Year of Pig/Boar starts on 17
February 2007!!! at:  http://www.chinavoc.com/zodiac/pig/year.asp &
http://www.chinavoc.com/zodiac/pig.asp [all signs/years at:
http://www.astrologycom.com/chinesezodiac.html] **

Prof. Dr. Barbara Kwiatkowska
Professor of International Law of the Sea
Deputy Director NILOS
Faculty of Law - Utrecht University
Achter Sint Pieter 200
3512 HT Utrecht - The Netherlands
Phone: 31 30 253 7037/7038
Fax: 31 30 253 7073
http://www.law.uu.nl/nilos
E-mail: [log in to unmask] 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager