> >However, ideally Analysis could be modified so this sort of situation
> >should be avoided in the first place. If the user is copying assignments
> >across to a chain that already has assignments, then there ought to be an
> >option to merge resonances that relate to the same atoms (and have
> >similar shifts).
>
> This option sounds like it could be very useful. However, the strange thing
> in this instance is that the target chain is a completely new chain I just
> created and it has no assignments. I looked but wasnt even sure where the
> extra resonances are coming from.
Ugh. Well I guess that there was a duplication at an earlier stage. If you
have any ideas where, let me know. I will check the copy chain assignments
code to make sure it is not there.
T.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Tim Stevens Email: [log in to unmask]
Department of Biochemistry [log in to unmask]
University of Cambridge Phone: +44 1223 766018 (office)
80 Tennis Court Road +44 7816 338275 (mobile)
Old Addenbrooke's Site +44 1223 364613 (home)
Cambridge CB2 1GA WWWeb: http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~tjs23
United Kingdom http://www.pantonia.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------ +NH3CH(CH(CH3)OH)C(O)NHCH(CH(CH3)CH2CH3)C(O)NHCH(CH2CH2SCH3)CO2- -------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|