I'll leave the technical point to Wayne or Tim, though I suspect the
answer is that the popup checks what windows are approriate for each new
peak selection and delivers them in a default order. Having done similar
stuff in the past I agree that it would be nice if the popup rembered
which window you last viewed a crosspeak from a particular spectrum in
from selection to selection (if the overhead is not to horrific).
But....
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Ben Goult wrote:
> However, when I delete peaks using the Peak Selection pop-up then when I
> choose the next peak it always defaults back to the wrong window so I have
> to reselect the correct window each time.
on a more philosophical note - should you really be deleting the unmatched
peaks? I'm guessing this is a NOESY that you have (semi)automatically
picked, or even picked by hand, and that you're wishing to exclude the
unmatched peaks from further consideration at this point. Analysis & the
data model give you the tools to "do the right thing" in this respect i.e.
keep the peaks as picked, but set the merit to e.g. 0 so that they can be
excluded that way. You can even use the details field to annotate the
reason for exclusion. You may have heard Michael Nilges & folk begging
for some less "filtered" data to be deposited to allow the software
community to develop tools that will help to reduce the amount of manual
labour we have to devote to our data analysis. Also, if the peaks are
excluded in some way, they're not going to result in constraints anyway,
so no need to delete them?
Brian
--
Dr. Brian O. Smith ---------------------- B Smith at bio gla ac uk
Division of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology,
Institute Biomedical & Life Sciences,
Joseph Black Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Tel: 0141 330 5167/6459/3089 Fax: 0141 330 8640
|