You can find American iron production exhaustively documented in Robert
Gordon's superb American Iron: 1607-1900 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
University Press, 1996).
David Killick
Associate Professor
Department of Anthropology
University of Arizona
Tucson, AZ 85721-0030
U.S.A.
phone (520) 621-8685
fax (520) 621-2088
-----Original Message-----
From: Arch-Metals Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Bart Torbert
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 1:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Falling Creek IW
This discussion brings up a side question.
What was the iron production in pre-Revolutionary America? The question is
relative to the Americans ability to provide war needs from native sources.
Bart
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Steve Gray <[log in to unmask]>
> The precursors of the furnaces are more likely to be Welsh rather than
English,
> from such counties as Carmarthenshire, Glamorgan and Gwent.
> Yours Steve Gray
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Peter King
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 10:08 AM
> Subject: Re: Falling Creek IW
>
>
> The precursors of the furnace would inevitably be English. I cannot
think of
> evidence from 1620s or earlier, but later English furnaces had systems for
> draining water from below the furnace, but I think the foundations would
have
> been in stone. However, at that period, timber-framing of buildings was
still
> common in England, with lath and plaster between the timbers. It is thus
quite
> possible that other parts of the furnace buildings would be of timber, not
to
> mention the waterwheel.
>
> The traditional view is that furnaces went into blast in the autumn and
blew
> until the early summer. While this was not invariably done in places
where the
> water-supply was good enough, it almost certainly has an element of truth
in it.
> I would have expected May to be the anticipated end of the first blast,
not its
> start. On the other hand, if the furnace was in blast at the time of the
> massacre, I would expect it still to be (or have been) there and full of
its
> large charge.
>
> This is of course all speculation.
>
> Peter King
> 49, Stourbridge Road,
> Hagley,
> Stourbridge
> West Midlands
> DY9 0QS
> 01562-720368
> [log in to unmask]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arch-Metals Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf
Of
> James Brothers
> Sent: 23 January 2007 02:47
> To: Peter King
> Subject: Falling Creek IW
>
>
> Lyle Browning, the Falling Creek IW archaeologist, has proposed a
number of
> possible explanations for the timbers recently discovered at the site.
While
> much of the equipment at an ironworks (e.g. wheel, bellows, anvil, and
hammer)
> rested on substantial timber structures, is there evidence elsewhere for
heavy
> wood foundations for blast furnaces? Or is this more likely to be part of
the
> wheel support/foundation or some other part of the water power system? Or
is
> there another possibility that hasn't been thought of yet? If Winchester
> Cathedral could be built on a raft, why not a blast furnace?
>
>
> James Brothers, RPA
> [log in to unmask]
|