I have heard nothing since following my conveyance to them that the
information they were requesting was irrelevant to the clinical
treatment and that they should base repatriation on the clinical
condition of the patient.
Extrapolating further - I can imaging that we would get all of the
fallout if things went wrong and they decided not to repatriate on our
reports (that would be hurried no doubt in the middle of busy
surgeries.)
paul Bromley
On 17/01/07, James Laing <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Tom Sargent wrote:
> > Anyone got a link to the GPC advice as I am unhsappy every time with the
> > moral blackmail but usually succumb.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> >>I told them that GPC advice was that we should not give a report at
> >>this stage and that they should decide whether to repatriate or not on
> >>the information they had. Is this the consensus from last time?? The
> >>old grey matter and all that!!!
> >>
> >>Paul Bromley
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> I don't know about GPC advice but on the last couple of occasions have
> responded in writing that I find the request unethical and not a service
> that I'm prepared to offer. I have heard nothing more but the patients
> in question were treated and got safely home without problem.
>
> --
> Dr James Laing
> Pocklington
> East Yorkshire
>
|