<Sigh>
I suppose if I am to get any serious responses, I'll have to start a new
thread!
Don't get me wrong - I *enjoy* banter - but has anyone done a study on
how to kill serious discussion on a mailing list?
Is there a masters in this? ;->>>>
</sigh>
MaryH
Even more depressed - oh, all right, "low mood" than before.. ;-<<<
In message <[log in to unmask]>,
John Clegg <[log in to unmask]> writes
>Blimey, how did I miss that opportunity? How am I going to fulfil my
>resolution to be declared an undesirable by CfH??
>
>On 09/01/07, Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 09/01/07, Alison Young <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > *Surely* the expertise exists in CfH to get it right the first time
> round?
> > Or does it?
> > >> I would not even attempt to answer that one Mary - we can all
> speculate!
>
> I believe the usual form is "you might think so, but I could not
> possibly comment".
>
> ;-)
>
> --
> Michael Leuty
> Nottingham, UK
--
Mary Hawking
|