I think that DC agents is a group who are working on what should be
the DC way to approach vales for such elements as creator,
contributor, publisher, etc while I think the encyclopaedia people
want to describe people, not resources....
Liddy
On 11/12/2006, at 1:56 PM, Flack, Irvin wrote:
>
> What about the DC Agents Working Group? I don't know a lot about their
> work but would this fall under their charter?
> http://dublincore.org/groups/agents/
>
>
> Irvin Flack
> Metadata Librarian
> Centre for Learning Innovation
> NSW Department of Education and Training
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liddy Nevile [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, 11 December 2006 9:49 AM
> To: Flack, Irvin
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: people metadata
>
> I guess an interesting question is:
>
> What interest is there in Dublin Core having a standard DC (core)
> version of all these 'people' profiles?
>
> Liddy
>
> On 11/12/2006, at 9:31 AM, Flack, Irvin wrote:
>
>>
>> There is an ISO group working on an identifier for 'parties'
>> (people/corp bodies): International Standard Party Identifier
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Party_Identifier
>>
>> "ISO TC 46/SC 9 is developing the International Standard Party
>> Identifier (ISPI) as a new international identification system for
>> the
>> parties (persons and corporate bodies) involved in the creation and
>> production of content entities."
>>
>> Irvin Flack
>> Metadata Librarian
>> Centre for Learning Innovation
>> NSW Department of Education and Training
>>
>> *********************************************************************
>> *
>> This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
>> privileged information or confidential information or both. If you
>> are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the
>> sender.
>> *********************************************************************
>> *
>
> **********************************************************************
> This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
> privileged information or confidential information or both. If you
> are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender.
> **********************************************************************
|